Achieving near-correct focus cues in a 3-D display using multiple image planes

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5666, Issue , 2005, Pages 393-401

  Watt, Simon J ^a   Akeley, Kurt ^b   Girshick, Anna R ^c   Banks, Martin S ^c  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH ASIA   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Human computer interaction; Stereoscopic displays; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SPECIAL EFFECTS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DECOUPLING; IMAGE INTENSITY; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS; STEREOSCOPIC IMAGES;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 21944447274     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.610851     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Judge, S. J., & Miles, F. A., Changes in the coupling between accommodation and vergence eye movements induced in human subjects by altering the effective interocular distance. Perception, 14, 617-629, 1985.
2. Wann, J. P., Rushton, S., & Mon-Williams, M., Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35, 2731-2736, 1995.
3. Wöpking, M., Viewing comfort with stereoscopic pictures: An experimental study on the subjective effects of Disparity magnitude and depth of focus. Journal of the SID, 101-103, 1995.
4. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. J., Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412, 1995.
5. Watt, S. J., Banks, M. S., Ernst, M. O., & Zumer, J. M., Screen cues to flatness do affect 3d percepts. Journal of Vision, 2(7), 297a, 2002.
6. Watt, S. J., Akeley, K. & Banks, M. S., Focus cues to display distance affect perceived depth from disparity. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 66a, 2003.
7. Akeley, K., Watt, S. J., Girshick, A. R., & Banks, M. S., A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 23, 1804-813, 2004.
8. McDowall, I. & Bolas, M., Fakespace labs accommodation display research. Unpublished report, 1994.
9. Wright, S. L., IBM 9.2-megapixel flat-panel display: Technology and infrastructure. SPIE Proceedings 4712 (Apr.), 24-34, 2002.
10. Rolland, J. P., Krueger, M. W., & Goon, A. A., Dynamic focusing in head-mounted displays. SPIE, 3639, 463-470, 1999.
11. Smith, G., Jacobs, R. J. & Chan, C. D., Effect of defocus on visual acuity as measured by source and observer methods. Optometry & Vision Science, 66, 430-435, 1989.
12. Banks, M. S., Gepshtein, S. & Landy, M. S., Why is Stereoresolution so low? Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2077-2089, 2004.
13. Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J., The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293-1313, 2001.
14. Hung, G. K., Zhu, H. M. & Ciuffreda, K. J., Convergence and divergence exhibit different response characteristics to symmetric stimuli. Vision Research, 37, 1197-1205, 1997.
15. Akeley, K., Achieving near-correct focus cues using multiple image planes. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2004.
16. de Berg, M., van Kreveld, M., Overmars, M., & Schwarzkopf, O., Computational geometry: Algorithms and applications (2nd Ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
17. Knill, D. C., Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: Human and ideal observers compared. Vision Research, 38, 1683-1711, 1998.
18. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S., Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4, 967-992, 2004.