The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 8-29

  Bachman, Ronet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944445683     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854898025001002     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Alexander, C. H., & Hubble, D. (1990). Sample weights for the NCVS and NCVS estimation. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Design and Use of the National Crime Victimization Survey, College Park, Maryland.
2. Antunes, G., & Hunt, A. L. (1973). The impact of certainty and severity of punishment on levels of crime in American states: An extended analysis. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 64, 486-493.
3. Bachman, R. (1993). Predicting the reporting of rape victimizations: Have reforms made a difference? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 254-270.
4. Bachman, R. (1995). Is the glass half empty or half full? A response to Pollard (1995). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 81-85.
5. Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1993). A contemporary look at the effects of rape law reform: How far have we really come? The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 84, 554-574.
6. Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1997). Statistical methods for criminology and criminaljustice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review, 26, 401-432.