Comparison of lipofection and electroporation gene transfer into mammalian cells

Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 290-291

  Qian, Feng ^a   Xiao, Cheng Zu ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Comparison study; Electroporation; Lipofection; Transfection

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944445632     PISSN: 10003282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Chang D C, Chassy B M, Saunders J A, et al. Academic Press Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992. 465-470
2. Felgner P L, Gadek T R, Holm M, et al. Lipofection: a highly efficient lipid-mediated DNA transfection procedure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1987, 84 (21): 7413-7417
3. Baum C, Forster P, Hegewisch-Becker S, et al. An optimized electroporation protocol applicable to a wide range of cell lines. BioTechinques, 1994, (6): 1058-1062
4. Pari G S, Keown W A. Experimental strategies in efficient of mammalian cells. Calcium phosphate and DEAE-dextran. Methods Mol Biol, 1997, 62 (1): 301-306
5. Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. 2nd. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989: 24-28
6. Wang D, Jing N, Lin Q. Stearylamine liposome as a new efficient reagent for DNA transfection of eukaryotic cells. Biochem Biophy Res Commu, 1996, 226 (2): 450-455
7. Spencer S C. Electroporation technique of DNA transfection. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1993, 42 (1): 75-82