Where should you sit to watch a movie?

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5666, Issue , 2005, Pages 316-325

  Banks, Martin S ^a   Rose, Heather F ^a   Vishwanath, Dhanraj ^a   Girshick, Ahna R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; CAMERAS; DATA PROCESSING; MOTION PICTURES; PROJECTION SYSTEMS;

BINOCULAR INFORMATION; CENTER OF PROJECTION (COP); LIGHT FIELDS; PERSPECTIVE PROJECTION;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 21944441791     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.601939     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Burt, P. & Julesz, B. (1980). A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. Science 208, 615-617.
2. Caprile, B. & Torre, V. (1990). Using vanishing points for camera calibration. International Journal of Computer Vision 4, 127-140.
3. Cutting, J.E. (1987). Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 13, 323-334.
4. Epstein, W.P. & Park, J.N. (1963). Shape constancy: Functional relationships and theoretical formulations. Psychological Bulletin 60, 265-288.
5. Gårding, J. (1992). Shape from texture for smooth curved surfaces in perspective projection. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 2, 329-352.
6. Gershun, A. (1939). The light field. Journal of Mathematics and Physics 23, 51-151.
7. Gibson, J.J. (1950). The Perception of the Visual World. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, USA.
8. Goldstein, E.B. (1987). Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 13, 256-266.
9. Gombrich, E.H. (1960). Art and Illusion. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA).
10. Hagen, M.A. (1976). Influence of picture surface and station point on the ability to compensate for oblique view in pictorial perception. Developmental Psychology 12, 57-63.
11. Hillis, J.M., Watt, S.J., Landy, M.S., & Banks, M.S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 4, 967-992.
12. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian Inference. Annual Review of Psychology 55, 271-304.
13. Kingslake, R. (1951). Lenses in Photography: The Practical Guide to Optics for Photograhpers. (Case-Hoyt).
14. Koenderink, J.J. & van Doom, A.J. (2003). Pictorial space. Looking into Pictures: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space. Hecht, H., Schwartz, R., & Atherton, M., Eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, USA).
15. Knill, D.C. & Saunders, J.A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research 43, 2539-2558.
16. Kubovy, M. (1986). The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. (Cambridge University Press, New York).
17. Landy, M.S., Maloney, L.T., Johnston, E.B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 35, 389-412.
18. Leonardo da Vinci. (1970). The Literary Works of Leonardo da Vinci. J.P. Richter, Ed. (Phaidon, London, England).
19. Mamassian, P. (1997).Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space. Experimental Brain Research 114, 235-245.
20. Meister, R. (1966). The iso-deformation of images and the criterion for delimitation of the usable areas in cine-auditoriums. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers 75, 179-182.
21. Perkins, D.N. Compensating for distortion in viewing pictures obliquely. Perception & Psychophysics 14, 13-18 (1973).
22. Pirenne, M.H. (1970). Optics, Painting and Photography. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
23. Rosinski, R.R. & Farber, J. (1980). Compensation for viewing point in the perception of pictured space. The Perception of Pictures. M.A. Hagen, Ed. (Academic Press, New York, USA).
24. Rosinski, R.R., Mulholland, T., Degelman, D., & Farber, J. (1980). Picture perception: An analysis of visual compensation. Perception & Psychophysics 28, 521-526.
25. Sedgwick, H.A. (1991). The effects of viewpoint on the virtual space of pictures. Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments. Ellis, S.R., Kaiser, M.K., & Grunwald, A.C., Eds. (Taylor & Francis, London, England).
26. Wallach, H. & Marshall, F.J. (1986).Shape constancy in pictorial representation. Perception & Psychophysics 39, 233-235.
27. Zorin, D. & Barr, A.H. (1995). Correction of geometric perceptual distortions in pictures. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1995, ACM SIGGRAPH 14, 257-264.