Gruppenarbeit: Die kluft zwischen sozialpsychologischer theoriebildung und organisationspsychologischer anwendung

Gruppendynamik

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 381-403

  Scholl, Wolfgang ^a  

^a Institut für Psychologie   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944441723     PISSN: 00466514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Antoni, C. (1990). Qualitätszirkel als Modell partizipativer Gruppenarbeit. Bern: Huber.
2. Argote, L. & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Group processes in organizations: continuity and change. In C. Cooper & I. J. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (S.). London: Wiley.
3. Axelrod, R. (Ed.) (1976). Structure of decision. The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: University Press.
4. Bales, R. F. & Cohen, S. P., with Williamson, S. A. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: The Free Press.
5. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M. & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468.
6. Beck, D. (1992). Kooperation und Abgrenzung. Zur Dynamik von Intergruppen-Beziehungen in Kooperationssituationen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
7. Beck, D. & Orth, B. (1995). Wer wendet sich an wen? - Muster in der Interaktion kooperierender Kleingruppen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 92-106.
8. Becker-Beck, U. (1997). Soziale Interaktion in Gruppen. Struktur- und Prozeßanalyse. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
9. Blalock, H. M. Jr. (Ed.) (1971). Causal models in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine - Atherton.
10. Boos, M. (1996). Entscheidungsfindung in Gruppen - Eine Prozeßanalyse. Bern: Huber.
11. Brauner, E. (1994). Soziale Interaktion und mentale Modelle. Münster: Waxmann.
12. Bredenkamp, J. (1980). Theorie und Planung psychologischer Experimente. Darmstadt: Steinkopff.
13. Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally.
14. nd rev. ed., pp. 102-204). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
16. Cranach, M. v. (1990). Eigenaktivität, Geschichtlichkeit und Mehrstufigkeit. In E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie und Systemtheorie (S. 13-49). Braunschweig: Braunschweiger Studien zur Erziehungs- und Sozialarbeitswissenschaft.
17. Cranach, M. v. (1996). Toward a theory of the acting group. In E. H. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior. Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Vol. 2. (pp. 147-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Diehl, M. & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
19. Emery, F. E. & Trist, E. L. (1969). Socio-technical systems. In F. E. Emery (Ed.), Systems thinking (281-296). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
20. Emery, F. E. & Thorsrud, E.. (1982). Industrielle Demokratie. Bern: Huber.
21. Fisch, R. (1994). Eine Methode zur Analyse von Interaktionsprozessen beim Problemlösen in Gruppen. Gruppendynamik, 25, 149-168.
22. Fisch, R., Daniel, H. D. & Beck, D. (1991). Kleingruppenforschung - Forschungsschwerpunkte und Forschungstrends. Gruppendynamik, 22, 237-261.
23. Forsyth, D. R. (1990). Group dynamics (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
24. Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R. & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 211-232.
25. Gadenne, V. (1976). Die Gültigkeit psychologischer Untersuchungen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
26. Glanzer, M. & Glaser, R. (1961). Techniques for the study of group structure and behavior: II. Empirical studies of the effects of structure in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 317-332.
27. Goodman, P. S. (1986). Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analysis. A comprehensive introduction for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Gottman, J. M. & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential analysis. A guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Guetzkow, H. & Simon, H. A. (1955). The impact of certain communication nets upon organization and performance in task-oriented groups. Management Science, 1, 233-250.
31. Hackman, J. R. & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99).
32. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D. & Pennington, N. (1984). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Herkner, W. (1991). Lehrbuch Sozialpsychologie (5., stark erw. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.
34. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace. (Deutsch: Theorie der sozialen Gruppe, 3. Aufl. 1968. Köln, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.)
35. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
36. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
37. Kiessler, K. & Scholl, W. (1976). Partizipation und Macht in aufgabenorientierten Gruppen - Ein Feldexperiment zur Therie der organisatorischen Bedingtheit von Gruppenprozessen. Frankfurt: Haag & Herchen.
38. Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50.
39. Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
40. McGrath; J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, Interaction, and performance (TIP). A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
42. Moorhead, G. & Montanari, J. R. (1986). An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomenon. Human Relations, 39, 399-410.
43. Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A. & Hains, S.C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
44. Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E.H. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior. Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Vol. 2. (pp. 11-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Nemeth, C. J. (1981). Jury trials: Psychology and law. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 309-367). New York: Academic Press.
46. O. V. (1995). Facharbeiter-Perspektiven besser als angenommen. Informationsdienst des Instituts der deutschen Wirtschaft, 21, (49), 4-5.
47. Rice, R. E. (Ed.). (1984). Communication, research, and technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48. Sader, M. (1991). Anmerkungen zum Stand der Kleingruppenforschung. Gruppendynamik, 21, 263-278.
49. Scholl, W. (1996). Effective teamwork - A theoretical model and a test in the field. In E. H. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior. Small group processes and interpersonal relations. (Vol. 2, pp. 127-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Scholl, W., Hoffmann, L. & Gierschner, H.-C. (1993). Innovation und Information. Wie in Unternehmen neues Wissen produziert wird. DFG-Abschlußbericht: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
51. Scholl, W. & Kiessler, K. (1990). Systemebenen in der Gruppenforschung. In E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie und Systemtheorie (S. 219-231). Braunschweig: Braunschweiger Studien zur Erziehungs- und Sozialarbeitswissenschaft.
52. Shaw, M.E. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 111-147). New York: Academic Press.
53. Shaw, M.E. (1971). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
54. Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the sociological form of the group. American Journal of Sociology, 8, 1-46, 158-196.
55. Simpson, J. A. & Wood, W. (1992). Where ist the group in social psychology? An historical overview. In S. Worchel, W. Wood & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 1-10), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Steiner, I. D. (1966). Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. Behavioral Science, 11, 273-283.
57. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
58. Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 94-108.
59. Steiner, I. D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 251-289). New York: Academic Press.
60. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M. & Abakoumkin, G. (1996). Social compensation and the Köhler effect: Toward a theoretical explanation of motivation gains in group productivity. In E. H. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior. Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Vol. 2. (pp. 37-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P. & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
62. Szameitat, S. C. (1997). Aufgabenstrukturen der Gruppenarbeit in der Praxis. Unveröff. Diplomarbeit, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
63. Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology. A critical assessment (pp. 69-122). London: Academic Press.
64. Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., McGuire, C., Chang, S., & Feld, P. (1992). Assessing political group dynamics: A test of the groupthink model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 403-425.
65. Tuckman, B.W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
66. Ulich, E. (1994). Arbeitspsychologie (3., überarb. und erw. Aufl.). Zürich/Stuttgart: vdf Hochschulverlag/Schäffer-Poeschel.
67. Ulich, E., Conrad-Betschart, H. & Baitsch, C. (1989). Arbeitsform mit Zukunft: Ganzheitlich-flexibel statt arbeitsteilig. Bern: Lang.
68. Vorwerg, M. (1966). Sozialpsychologische Analysen des Kollektivs. Berlin/Ost: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
69. Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.
71. Witte, E. H. (1989). Köhler rediscovered: The anti-Ringelmann effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.
72. Witte, E. H. (1996). Similarities among various conceptual positions and theoretical points of view. In E.H. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior. Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Vol. 2 (pp. 295-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.