Results of a national survey of state protective services programs: Assessing risk and defining victim outcomes

Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-86

  Goodrich, Carolyn Stahl ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944434152     PISSN: 08946566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J084v09n01_05     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. APWA/NASUA (1986). A comprehensive analysis of state policy and practice related to elder abuse: A focus on legislation, appropriations, incidence data and special studies. Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association, National Association of State Units on Aging.
2. Neale, A.V., Hwalek, M.A., Goodrich, C.S., & Quinn, K.M. (1996). The Illinois elder abuse system: Program description and administrative findings. Gerontologist, 36(4), 502-511.
3. NASUA/APWA (1988). Adult protective services: Programs in state social service agencies and state units on aging. Washington, DC: National Association of State Units on Aging, American Public Welfare Association.
4. NASUA/APWA (1988). State strategies for assessing risk in elder abuse programs; Summary of national practice exchange teleconferences. Washington, DC: National Association of State Units on Aging, American Public Welfare Association.
5. Stiegel, L. (1995). Recommended guidelines for state courts handling cases involving elder abuse. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
6. Tatara, T. (1993). Understanding the nature and scope of domestic elder abuse with the use of state aggregate data: Summaries of the key findings of a national survey of state APS and aging agencies. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 5(4), 35-58.
7. Tatara, T. (1996). Understanding the nature and extent of elder abuse in domestic settings. Washington, DC: National Center on Elder Abuse.