Veto power and legislation: An empirical analysis of executive and legislative bargaining from 1961 to 1986

Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 282-312

  Mccarty, Nolan M ^a   Poole, Keith T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21844521143     PISSN: 87566222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bond, Jon R., and Richard Fleisher. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Corwin, Edward S. 1941. The President: Office and Powers. New York: New York University Press.
3. Davis, Otto A., Melvin J. Hinich, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process,” 65 American Political Science Review 426-48.
4. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Edwards, George C„ III. 1980. Presidential Influence in Congress. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
6. Enelow, James, and Melvin J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Ferejohn, John, and Charles Shipan. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy,” 6 Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 1-27.
8. Finer, Herman. 1932. Theory and Practice of Modem Government. Vol. 2. New York: Dial Press.
9. Grier, Kevin, Michael McDonald, and Robert Tollison. 1994. “Electoral Politics and the Presidential Veto,” working paper, George Mason University.
10. Groseclose, Timothy. 1994. “A Model and Test of Blame-Game Politics,” mimeo, Carnegie Mellon University.
11. Hammond, Thomas H., and Gary J. Miller. 1987. “The Core of the Constitution,” 81 American Political Science Review 1155-74.
12. Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael C. Munger. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13. Poole, Keith T., and Walker Pollard. 1981. “A New Approach to the Spatial Theory of Electoral Competition,” 25 American Journal of Political Science 323-41.
14. Ingberman, Daniel, and Dennis Yao. 1991a. “Circumventing Formal Structure Through Commitment: Presidential Influence and Agenda Control,” 70 Public Choice 151-79.
15. Poole, Keith T., andPoole, Keith T.1991b. “Presidential Commitment and the Veto,” 35 American Journal of Political Science 351-89.
16. Kemell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
17. Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1988. “Presidential Influence in the Appropriations Process,” 32 American Journal of Political Science 713-36.
18. Poole, Keith T. and Poole, Keith T.1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Lee, Lung-Fei, and Robert H. Porter. 1984. “Switching Regression Models with Imperfect Sample Separation with an Application to Cartel Stability,” 52 Econometrica 391-418.
20. Lohmann, Susanne, and Sharyn O’Halloran. 1992. “Delegation and Accommodation in United States Trade Policy,” working paper, Stanford University.
21. Martin, Elizabeth. 1994. “An Information Theory of Congressional Delegation,” working paper, University of Iowa.
22. Matthews, Steven A. 1989. “Veto Threats: Rhetoric in a Bargaining Game,” 104 Quarterly Journal of Economics 347-69.
23. McCarty, Nolan M. 1994. “Presidential Reputation and the Veto,” working paper, University of Southern California.
24. Miller, Gary. 1993. “Formal Theory and the Presidency,” in G. C. Edwards III, J. H. Kessel, and B. Rockman, eds., Researching the Presidency: Vital Questions, New Approaches. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
25. Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modem Presidents. New York: Macmillan.
26. Ordeshook, Peter C. 1976. “The Spatial Theory of Elections: A Review and a Critique,” in I. Budge, I. Crewe, and D. Farlie, eds., Party Identification and Beyond. New York: Wiley.
27. Poole, Keith T. 1990. “Least Squares Metric, Unidimensional Scaling of Multivariate Linear Models,” 55 Psychometrika 123-49.
28. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis,” 29 American Journal of Political Science 357-84.
29. Poole, Keith T., and Poole, Keith T. 1986. “The Dynamics of Interest Group Evaluations of Congress.” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
30. Poole, Keith T., and Poole, Keith T.1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting,” 35 American Journal of Political Science 228-78.
31. Poole, Keith T., and Poole, Keith T. 1995. “Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting,” manuscript, Camegie-Mellon University.
32. Poole, Keith T., and Richard A. Smith. 1994. “A Spatial Analysis of Winning and Losing Motions in the U.S. Senate 1979-1981,” 78 Public Choice 23-41.
33. Rivers, Douglas, and Nancy Rose. 1985. “Passing the President’s Program: Public Opinion and Presidential Influence in Congress,” 29 American Journal of Political Science 183-96.
34. Rohde, David, and Dennis M. Simon. 1985. “Presidential Vetoes and Congressional Response: A Study of Institutional Conflict,” 29 American Journal of Political Science 397-427.
35. Romer, Thomas, and Howard Rosenthal. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo,” 33 Public Choice 27-14.
36. Snyder, James M. 1992. “Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings,” 27 Legislative Studies Quarterly 319-46.
37. Spitzer, Robert J. 1988. The Presidential Veto: Touchstone of the American Presidency. Albany: SUNY Press.
38. Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi. 1994. Vital Statistics on American Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
39. Sundquist, James L. 1981. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.
40. Watson, Richard A. 1993.Presidential Vetoes and Public Policy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
41. Woolley, John T. 1991. “Institutions, the Election Cycle, and the Presidential Veto,” 35 American Journal of Political Science 279-304.
42. Zupan, Mark. 1992. “Measuring the Ideological Preferences of United States Presidents-A Proposed Extremely Simple Method,” 73 Public Choice 351-61.