An Objective Structured Clinical Exam in a Multisite Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 177-181

  Young, William W ^a   Barthold, Joan C ^a   Birenbaum, Debra ^a   Long, Phyllis ^a   Dion, Michele ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21844516833     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: 15328015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10401339509539737     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Petrusa ER, Blackwell TA, Carline J, et al. A multi-institutional trial of an objective structured clinical examination. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1991; 3:86–94.
2. Kowlowitz V, Hoole AJ, Sloane PD. Implementing the objective structure clinical examination: A traditional medical school. Academic Medicine 1991; 66:345–7.
3. Grand’Maison P, Blouin D., Briere D. Utilization of the objective structured clinical examination in gynecology/obstetrics. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education (pp. 65–70). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1985.
4. APGO Medical Student Educational Objectives (5th ed.). Undergraduate Medical Education Committee. Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1984
5. Kretchmar R. Evolution of the Gynecologic Teaching Associate: An educational specialist. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1978;131:367–9.
6. Beckman CRB, Barzansky B, Sharf B, Meyers K. Training Gynecology Teaching Associates. Medical Education 1988; 22:124–31.
7. Marienfeld RD, Reid JC. Subjective vs objective evaluation of clinical clerkship. New England Journal of Medicine 1980; 302: 1036–7.
8. Lawrence PF, Nelson EW, Cockayne TW. Assessment of medical student fund of knowledge in surgery. Surgery 1985; 97: 745–9.
9. King AM, Perkowski-Rogers LC, Pohl HS. Planning standardized patient programs: Case development, patient training, and costs. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1994; 6: 6–14.
10. Hollingsworth MA, Boyd RF, Frye AW. Description of observer feedback in an objective structured clinical examination and effects on examinees. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1994; 6: 49–53.
11. Metheny W. Halo effect: Limitations of physician ratings in the assessment of student clinical performance in obstetrics clerkships. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991; 78: 136–40.
12. Anderson D, Harris I, Allen S, Satran L, Bland C, Davis-Feickert J, Poland G, Miller W. Comparing students’ feedback about clinical instruction with their performances. Academic Medicine 1991; 66: 29–34.
13. Higgin JR, Harasym PH. Using the OSCE to identify strengths and weaknesses in learning at three teaching hospitals. In RM Harden, H Mulholland (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th Ottawa Conference on Medical Education, Dundee, 1991.