Causality, blame and punishment

The Irish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1993, Pages 596-604

  Kanekar, Suresh ^a   Lata Dhir, Vidyut ^a   Franco, Bunny ^a   Archana, R ^a   Sindhakar, S ^a   Vaz, Laura ^a   Nazareth, Avertano M ^a  

^a University of Mumbai   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21844488740     PISSN: 03033910     EISSN: 21580812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03033910.1993.10557974     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dhir, V.L. & Kanekar, S. (In press). Indian merchant navy officers’ judgments of causality, blameworthiness and punishment for a shipping accident. Applied Psychology: An International Review.
2. Fincham, F.D. & Emery, R.E. (1988). Limited mental capacities and perceived control in attribution of responsibility, British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 193-207.
3. Fincham, F.D. & Jaspers, J.M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol 13, p. 81–138. New York: Academic Press.
4. Fincham, F.D. & Roberts, C. (1985). Intervening causation and the mitigation of responsibility for harm doing: II. The role of limited mental capacities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 178-194.
5. Fincham, F.D. & Shultz, T.R. (1981). Intervening causation and the mitigation of responsibility for harm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 113-120.
6. Hamilton, V.L. (1978a). Obedience and responsibility: A jury simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 126-146.
7. Hamilton, V.L. (1978b). Who is responsible? Towards a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316–328.
8. Hamilton, V.L. (1980). Intuitive psychologist or intuitive lawyer? Alternative models of the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 767–772.
9. Hart, H.L.A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10. Harvey, M.D. & Rule, B.G. (1978). Moral evaluations and judgments of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 583–588.
11. Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
12. Kamat, S.S. & Kanekar, S. (1990). Prediction of and recommendation for honest behaviour. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 597–607.
13. Kanekar, S., Kolsawalla, M.B. & D’Souza, A. (1981). Attribution of responsibility to a victim of rape. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 165-170.
14. Kanekar, S. & Mazumdar, D. (1991). Attribution of responsibility for heart disease. Irish Journal of Psychology, 12, 367–381.
15. Kanekar, S. & Pinto, N.J.P. (1985). Perception of a helper in a criminal emergency. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 111–117.
16. Kanekar, S., Pinto, N.J.P. & Mazumdar, D.(1985). Causal and moral responsibility of victims of rape and robbery. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 622–637.
17. Kanekar, S. & Vaz, L. (1993). Effects of gender and status upon punctuality norms. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 377–384.
18. Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, p. 192–238. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
19. Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1983). Attributions of cause and responsibility as social phenomena. In J. Jaspers, F.D. Fincham & M. Hcwstone (Eds), Attribution Theory and Research: Conceptual, Developmental and Social Dimensions, p.261-289. London: Academic Press.
20. Nazareth, A.M. & Kanekar, S. (1986) Effects of admitting or denying a mistake. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 531–537.
21. Nogami, G.Y. & Streufert, S. (1983). The dimenstionality of attributions of causality and responsibility for an accident. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 433-436.
22. Pereira, L.B.& Kanekar, S.(1984). Perception of initiatory and retaliating cheating behaviour. Indian Psychologist, 3, 17–20.
23. Pinto, A.J. & Kanekar, S. (190). Social perception as a function of Machiavellianism. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 755–762.
24. Psychological Semin, G.R. & Manstead, A.S.R. (1983). The Accountability of Conduct: A Social Analysis. London: Academic Press.
25. Shaw, M.E. & Sulzer, J.L. (1964). An empirical lest of Heider ’ s levels in attribution of responsibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 39–46.
26. Shultz, T.R., Schleifer, M. & Altman, I. (1981). Judgements of causation, responsibility, and punishment in cases of harm-doing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 13, 238–253.
27. Vaz, L. & Kanekar, S. (1992). Gender differences in likelihood estimates and recommendations regarding antinormative behaviour in different ethical contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1688-1701.