Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty at 5 to 7 years followup

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 436, Issue , 2005, Pages 177-183

  Bertin, Kim C ^a,b  

^a Utah Hip and Knee Center   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 21844479618     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000160381.23052.34     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty projections to 2030. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/ wordhtml/pdfs_r/tjr.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2004.
2. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW: The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:1328-1335, 1982.
3. Bertin KC, Frischknecht SC: Prospective randomized comparison of cemented and uncemented mg-ii knee replacements. In Niwa S, Yoshino S, Kurosaka M, et al (eds). Reconstruction of the Knee Joint. Tokyo, Springer-Verlag 250-259, 1997.
4. Bertin KC, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al: In vivo determination of posterior femoral rollback for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:1040-1048, 2002.
5. Cheal EJ, Hayes WC, Lee CH, et al: Stress analysis of a condylar knee tibial component: Influence of metaphyseal shell properties and cement injection depth. J Orthop Res 3:424-434, 1985.
6. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR: The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1713-1720, 1995.
7. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell Jr CE, et al: In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop 356:47-57, 1998.
8. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM: In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop 331:107-117, 1996.
9. Goodfellow J, O'Connor J: The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg 60B:358-369, 1978.
10. Harwin SF, Stein AJ, Stern RE, Kulick RG: Heterotopic ossification following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:113-116, 1993.
11. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14, 1989.
12. Kim H, Pelker RR, Gibson DH, et al: Rollback in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 12:553-561, 1997.
13. Mailly T, Scott WN: Posterior stabilized knee arthroplasty. In Rand JA (ed). Total Knee Arthroplasty. New York, Raven Press 227, 1993.
14. Malkani AL, Rand JA, Bryan RS, Wallrichs SL: Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis: A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:423-431, 1995.
15. Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ: The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop 278:147-152, 1992.
16. Most E, Zayontz S, Li G, et al: Femoral rollback after cruciate-retaining and stabilizing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 410:101-113, 2003.
17. Ranawat CS, Flynn Jr WF, Saddler S, et al: Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop 286:94-102, 1993.
18. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM: Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 73A:397-409, 1991.
19. Riggi KS, Rand JA: Posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty. In Scott WN (ed). The Knee. St. Louis, Mosby 1117, 1994.
20. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, et al: Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 309:136-145, 1994.
21. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD: Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system: Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 80B:850-858, 1998.
22. Scott RD, Volatile TB: Twelve years' experience with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205:100-107, 1986.
23. Stern SH, Insall JN: Posterior stabilized prosthesis: Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:980-986, 1992.
24. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al: Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 77B:884-889, 1995.
25. Sumner DR, Kienapfel H, Jacobs JJ, et al: Bone ingrowth and wear debris in well-fixed cementless porous-coated tibial components removed from patients. J Arthroplasty 10:157-167, 1995.
26. Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S: Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: Balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty 17:813-819, 2002.
27. Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220-233, 1996.