Validation at a crossroads

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 187-

  Balls, Michael ^a   Combes, Robert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL AGENT; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; CARCINOGENESIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CORROSION; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 21844477620     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290503300306     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Worth, A.P. & Balls, M. (2002). The principles of validation and the ECVAM validation process. ATLA 30, Suppl. 2, 15-21.
2. Combes, R.D. (2003). A critical assessment of the OECD collaborative study to validate the uterotrophic assay for the detection of oestrogenic and anti-oestrogenic chemicals. ATLA 31, 489-499.
3. Combes, R.D. (2004). Peer review of validation studies: an assessment of the role of the OECD by reference to the validation of the uterotrophic assay for endocrine disrupters. ATLA 32, 111-117.
4. Hartung, T., Bremer, S., Casati, S., Coecke, S., Corvi, R., Fortaner, S., Gribaldo, L., Halder, M., Hoffmann, S., Janusch Roi, A., Prieto, P., Sabbioni, E., Scott, L., Worth, A. & Zuang, V. (2004). A modular approach to the ECVAM principles of test validity. ATLA 32, 467-472.
5. Anon. (2004). The Report from the Expert Group on (Quantitative) Structure Activity Relationship ([Q]SARs) on the Principles for the Validation of (Q)SARs. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 49, 206 pp. ENV/JM/MOMNO(2004)24. Paris, France: OECD.
6. Combes, R. & Balls, M. (2005). Intelligent testing strategies for chemicals testing - case of more haste, less speed? ATLA 33, 289-297.
7. Balls, M. & Combes, R. (2005). The need for a formal invalidation process for animal and non-animal tests. ATLA 33, 299-308.