Estimating components of variance in demographic parameters of Tawny Owls, Strix aluco

Animal Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 489-502

  Francis, Charles M ^a   Saurola, Pertti ^b  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Matrix models; Population fluctuations; Survival estimation; Voles; Winter weather

Indexed keywords

RAPTOR; SURVIVAL;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

MURIDAE; STRIGIFORMES; STRIX ALUCO;

EID: 21844471331     PISSN: 1578665X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brand, C. J. & Keith, L. L. B., 1979. Lynx demography during a snowshoe hare decline in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Manage., 43: 827-849.
2. Brommer, J. E., Pietiäinen, H, & Kolunen, H., 1998. The effect of age at first breeding on Ural owl lifetime reproductive success and fitness under cyclic food conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67: 359-369.
3. Brommer, J. E., Pieteäinen, H, & Kolunen, H., 2002. Reproduction and survival in a variable environment: Ural Owls (Strix uralensis) and the three-year vole cycle. The Auk, 119: 544-550.
4. Burnham, K. P., 1993. A theory for joint analysis of ring recovery and recapture data. In: Marked individuals in the study of bird population: 199-213 (J.-D. Lebreton & P. M. North, Eds.). Birkhäuser, Basel.
5. Caswell, H., 2001. Matrix Population Models: construction, analysis and interpretation, 2nd Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
6. Francis, C. M. & Saurola, P., 2002. Estimating age-specific survival rates of tawny owls - recaptures versus recoveries. Journal of Applied Statistics, 29: 637-647.
7. Freeman, S. N. & North, P. M., 1990. Estimation of survival rates of British, Irish and French Grey Herons. The Ring, 13: 139-166.
8. Hakkarainen, H., Korpimäki, E., Koivunen, V. & Ydenberg, R., 2002. Survival of male Tengmalm's owls under temporally varying food conditions. Oecologia, 131: 83-88.
9. Hanski, I., Hansson, L. & Henttonen, H., 1991. Specialist predators, generalist predators, and the microtine rodent cycle. Journal of Animal Ecology, 60: 353-367.
10. Houston, C. S. & Francis, C. M., 1995. Survival of Great Horned Owls in relation to the snowshoe hare cycle. The Auk, 112: 44-59.
11. Korpimäki, E., Klemola, T., Nordahl, K., Oksanen, L., Oksanen, T., Banks, P. B., Batzli, G. O. & Henttonen, H., 2003. Vote cycles and Predation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 494-495.
12. Krebs, C. J., Boonstra, R., Boutin, S., & Sinclair, A. R. E., 2001. What drives the 10-year cycle of Snowshoe Hares? Bioscience, 51: 25-35.
13. Link, W. & Barker, R., 2004. Hierarchical mark-recapture models: a framework for inference about demographic processes. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27.1: 441-449.
14. Nur, N. & Sydeman, W. J., 1999. Survival, breeding probability and reproductive success in relation to population dynamics of Brandt's Cormorants Phalacrocorax penicillatus. Bird Study, 46: S92-S103.
15. Oli, M. K., 2003. Population cycles of small rodents are caused by specialist predators: or are they? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 105-107.
16. Rohner, C., Doyle, R. I. & Smith, J. N. M., 2001. Great Horned Owls. In: Ecosystem dynamics of the boreal forest (C. J. Krebs, S. Boutin & R. Boonstra, Eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
17. Ruesink, J. L., Hodges, K. E. & Krebs, C. J., 2002. Mass-balance analyses of boreal forest population cycles: merging demographic and ecosystem approaches. Ecosystems, 5: 138-158.
18. SAS Institute, 2001. The SAS System for Windows, Release 8.02. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
19. Saurola, P., 1987. Mate and nest-site fidelity in Ural and Tawny Owls. In: Biology and conservation in northern forest owls: symposium proceedings; 1987 February 3-7; Winnipeg, Manitoba: 81-86 (R. W. Nero, R. J. Clark, R. J. Knapton & R. H. Hamre, Eds.). Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-142. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Co.
20. Saurola, P., 1995. Suomen pöllöt. Owls of Finland. Helsinki, Kirjayhtymä. (in Finnish with English Summary).
21. Saurola, P., 1997. Monitoring Finnish Owls 1982-1996: methods and results. In: Biology and conservation of owls of the northern hemisphere. 2nd International Symposium, February 5-9, 1997, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: 363-380 (J. R. Duncan, D. H. Johnson & T. H. Nichols, Eds.). USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NC.
22. Saurola, P., 2002. Natal dispersal distances of Finnish owls: results from ringing. In: Ecology and conservation of owls: 42-55 (I. Newton, R. Kavanagh, J. Olsen & I. Taylor, Eds.). CSIRO Publishing. Collingwood VIC, Australia.
23. Saurola, P., & Francis, C. M., 2004. Estimating population parameters of owls from nationally coordinated ringing data in Finland. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27.1:
24. Solonen, T. & Karhunen, J., 2002. Effects of variable feeding conditions on the Tawny Owl Strix aluco near the northern limit of its range. Ornis Fennica, 79: 121-131.
25. Sunde, P., Overskaug, K., Bolstad, J. P. & Øien, I. J., 2001. Living at the limit: ecology and behaviour of Tawny Owls Strix aluco in a northern edge population in Central Norway. Ardea, 89: 495-508.
26. Sundell, J., Huitu, O., Henttonen, H., Kaikusalo, A., Korpimäki, E., Pietiäinen, H., Saurola, P. & Hanski, I., 2004. Large-scale spatial dynamics of vole populations in Finland revealed by the breeding success of vole-eating predators. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73: 167-178.
27. White, G. C. & Burnham, K. P., 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46: S120-S139.