Density dependence in North American ducks

Animal Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 113-128

  Jamieson, Lara E ^a   Brooks, S P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autoregressive; Bayesian approach; Logistic; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Model choice; State space modelling

Indexed keywords

DENSITY DEPENDENCE;

ANAS;

EID: 21844467226     PISSN: 1578665X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bailey, R. O., 1981. A Theoretical Approach to Problems in Waterfowl Management. Transactions North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 46: 58-71.
2. Bayard, M. & Berger, J., 1998. Quantifying Surprise in the Data and Model Verification (with discussion). In: Bayesian Statistcs VI: 53-82 (J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid & A. Smith, Eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
3. Berryman, A. & Turchin, P., 2001. Identifying the Density-Dependent Structure Underlying Ecological Time Series. Oikos, 92: 265-270.
4. Brooks, S.P., 1998. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method and its Application. The Statistician, 47: 69-100.
5. Brooks, S. P., Catchpole, E. A. & Morgan, B. J. T., 2000. Bayesian Animal Survival Estimation. Statistical Science, 15: 357-376.
6. Brooks, S. P. & Roberts, G. O., 1998. Diagnosing Convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms. Statistics and Computing, 8: 319-335.
7. Bulmer, M. G., 1975. The Statistical Analysis of Density Dependence. Biometrics, 31: 901-911.
8. Carlin, B. P. & Louis, T. A., 1996. Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.
9. Clyde, M. A., 1999. Bayesian Model Averaging and Model Search Strategies. In: Bayesian Statistics 6: 157-186 (J. M. Bernardo, A. F. M. Smith, A. P. Dawid and J. O. Berger, Eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
10. Dennis, B. & Taper, M. L., 1994. Density Dependence in Time Series Observations of Natural Populations: Estimation and Testing. Ecological Monographs, 64: 205-224.
11. Diggle, P. J., 1990. Time Series: A Biostatistical Introduction. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
12. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B., 1995. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.
13. Gelman, A. & Meng, X., 1996. Model Checking and Model Improvement. In: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice: 189-201 (W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson & D. J. Spiegelhalter, Eds.). Chapman and Hall, London.
14. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter, D. J., 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, London.
15. Green, P. J., 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika, 82: 711-732.
16. Johnson, D. H. & Grier, J. W., 1988. Determinants of Breeding Distribution of Ducks. Wildlife Monographs, 100: 5-37.
17. Kass, R. E. & Raftery, A. E., 1995. Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90: 773-795.
18. Madigan, D. M., Raftery, A. E., Volinsky, C. & Hoeting, J., 1996. Bayesian Model Averaging. In: Integrating Multiple Learned Models (IMLM-96): 77-83 (P. Chan, S. Stolofo & D. Wolpert, Eds.).
19. Massot, M., Clobert, J., Pilorge, T., Lecomte J. & Barbault, R., 1992. Density Dependence in the Common Lizard: Demographic Consequences of a Density Manipulation. Ecology, 73: 1742-1756.
20. Newman, K. B., 1998. State-Space Modelling of Animal Movement and Mortality with Application to Salmon. Biometrics, 54: 1290-1314.
21. Nichols, J. D., Conroy, M. J., Anderson, D. R. & Burnham, K. P., 1984. Compensatory Mortality in Waterfowl Populations: A Review of the Evidence and Implications for Research and Management. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Nature Reserve Conference, 49: 535-554.
22. Nichols, J. D., Johnson, F. A. & Williams, B. K., 1995. Managing North - American Waterfowl in the Face of Uncertainty. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 26: 177-199.
23. Reddingius, J., 1971. Gambling for Existence: A Discussion of some Theretical Problems in Animal Population Ecology. Acta Biotheoretica, 20: 1-208.
24. Royama, T., 1981. Fundamental Concepts and Methodology for the Analysis of Population Dynamics, with particular reference to univoltine species. Ecological Monographs, 51: 473-493.
25. Shenk, T. M., White, G. C. & Burnham, K. P., 1998. Sampling-Variance Effects on Detecting Density Dependence from Temporal Trends in Natural Populations. Ecological Monographs, 68: 445-463.
26. Sullivan, P. J., 1992. A Kalman Filter Approach to Catch-at-Length Analysis. Biometrics, 48: 237-257.
27. Turchin, P., 1990. Rarity of density Dependence or Population Regulation with Lags? Nature, 344: 660-663.
28. Turchin, P., Lorio Jr, P. L., Taylor, A. D. & Billings, R. F., 1991. Why do Populations of Southern Pine Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Fluctuate? Environmental Entomology, 20: 401-409.
29. Vickery, W. & Nudds, T., 1984. Detection of Density Dependent Effects in Annual Duck Censuses. Ecology, 65: 96-104.
30. Viljugrein, H., Stenseth, N. C. & Steinbakk, G. H. (in press). Density Dependence in North American Ducks: A State-Space Modelling Approach. Ecology Letters.
31. Williams, B. K., Koneff, M. D. & Smith, D. A., 1999. Evaluation of Waterfowl Management under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63: 417-440.