메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 14-15

Are we talking about the butterflies or a butterfy effect?: Comment on 'No country is an island'

Author keywords

Developing countries; Ethics; Regulation; Sex selection

Indexed keywords

CHINA; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FAMILY LIFE; FEMALE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CLONING; INDIA; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LAW; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL EXPERT; MORALITY; NOTE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RELIGION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL ASPECT; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UNITED KINGDOM; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX RATIO;

EID: 21844451099     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61291-6     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (1)

References (2)
  • 1
    • 21844468215 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • No country is an island: Comment on the House of Commons Report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law
    • Dahl E 2005 No country is an island: comment on the House of Commons Report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11, 10-11
    • (2005) Reproductive BioMedicine Online , vol.11 , pp. 10-11
    • Dahl, E.1
  • 2
    • 85030795091 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • House of Commons Fifth report of session 2004-05. The Stationery office, London, UK
    • House of Commons 2005 Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law. Fifth report of session 2004-05. The Stationery office, London, UK, 1.
    • (2005) Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law , vol.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.