A review of computerised information technology systems in general practice medicine

Healthcare Review Online

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Didham, Rebecca ^a   Martin, Isobel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; AUTOMATION; CANADA; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MARKETING; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 21844444518     PISSN: 11737956     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Anonymous. Business: Hardly wired. The Economist 1998; Oct 24; 349(8091):68.
2. Royal College of General Practitioners. General practice computerisation. In: RCGP Information sheet no 7. 2003.
3. Western M, Dwan K, Western J, et al. Computerisation in Australian general practice. Aust Fam Physician 2003; 32(3):180-5.
4. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Information technology in general practice: A study into levels of and attitudes towards information technology in general practice. April 1999.
5. Kazimirski M, Renaud C, Sawaya L, et al. Computer literacy and electronic medical records. The College of Family Physicians of Canada. 2000.
6. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic Technology: A spark to revitalize primary care? JAMA 2003; 290(2):259-64.
7. Kenealy T, Arroll B, Kenealy H, et al. General practice changes in South Auckland from 1990 to 1999: A threat to continuity of care? NZFP 2002; 29(6):387-90.
8. Majeed A. Ten ways to improve information technology in the NHS. BMJ 2003; 326:202-6.
9. Canada Health Infoway. Annual Report 2003.
10. Bush G W. State of the Union Address, January 2004, United States Capitol, Washington DC..
11. Cesnik B. The future of health informatics. Int J Med Inf 1999; 55(1):83-5.
12. Cheong I. The legal acceptability of an electronic medical record. Aust Fam Physician 1997; 26(1):37-41.