Stakeholder theory in perspective

Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 5-21

  Pesqueux, Yvon ^a   Damak Ayadi, Salma ^b  

^a Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

Business ethics; Management theory; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 21844443097     PISSN: 14720701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14720700510562622     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Altman, B.W. (2000), Defining ‘Community as Stakeholder’ and Community Stakeholder Management: A Theory Elaboration Study, in Research in Stakeholder Theory 1997-1998, Clarkson Center for Business Ethics, University of Toronto.
2. Baron, D.P. (1995), Business and its Environment, Prentice Hall.
3. Barton, S.L., Hill, N.C. and Sundaran, S. (1989), “An empirical test of stakeholder theory predictions of capital structures”, Financial Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 36-44.
4. Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (1994), Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
5. Becker, L.C. (1992), “Places for pluralism”, Ethics, Vol. 102, pp. 707-19.
6. Boblio, R. (1987), Which Socialism, Polity Press, Londres.
7. Boudon, R. (1986), L’idéologie ou l’origine des idées reçues, Fayard, Paris.
8. Bowie, N. (1994), “A Kantian theory of capitalism”, presented at the 1994 Ruffin Lectures, The Dearden School, University of Virginia, Charlotteville, VA.
9. Bucholz, R.A. et al. (1994), Management Response in Public Issues, Prentice Hall.
10. Brenner, S.N. and Cochran, P. (1991), “The stakeholder theory of the firm: implications for business and society theory and research”, Annual Meeting of the International Association of Business and Society, Sundance, UT.
11. Brenner, S.N. and Molander, E.A. (1977), “Is the ethics of business changing?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 54-65.
12. Caroll, A.B. (1989), Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, South Western, Cincinatti, OH.
13. Clarkson, M.B. (1991), “Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social performance: a stakeholder management model”, in Post, J.E. (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 331-58.
14. Clarkson, M.B. (1995), “A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 92-117.
15. Coase, R.H. (1937), “The nature of the firm”, Economica, Vol. 16, pp. 331-51.
16. Cochran, P.L. and Wood, R.A. (1984), “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 42-56.
17. Cornel, B. and Shapiro, A.C. (1987), “Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance”, Financial Management, Vol. 16, pp. 5-14.
18. Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. (1977), L’acteur et le système, Seuil, Paris.
19. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995), “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 65-91.
20. Evan, W. and Freeman, R.E. (1983), “A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism”, in Beauchamp, T. and Bowie, N. (Eds), Ethical Theory and Business, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ, pp. 75-93.
21. Franklin, B. (1748), Advices to a Young Tradesman, Editions Sparks (1840), Boston, MA.
22. Freeman, E.R. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston, MA.
23. Freeman, E.R. (1994), “The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 409-21.
24. Freeman, E.R. (1999), “Divergent stakeholder theory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 233-6.
25. Freeman, E.R. and Evan, W.M. (1990), “Corporate governance: a stakeholder interpretation”, The Journal of Behavioural Economics, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 337-59.
26. Friedman, M. (1970), “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, The New York Times Magazine, 23 September.
27. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement, Harvard University Press.
28. Halal, W.E. (1990), “The management: business and social institutions in the information age”, Business in the Contemporary World, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 41-54.
29. Hall, S. and Jacques, M. (Eds) (1990), New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s, Hutchinson, London.
30. Hall, S. and Jefferson, T. (Eds) (1975), Resistance Through Rituals, Routledge, London.
31. Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, T.H. (1992), “Stakeholder – agency theory”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 131-53.
32. Hoggart, R. (1973), Speaking to Each Other, Pelican Books, London.
33. Hutton, J. (1999), The Stakeholders Society, Blackwell, London.
34. Jensen, M.C. (2000), “Value maximisation and the corporate objective function”, in Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (Eds), Breaking the Code of Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
35. Jensen, M.C. (2002), “Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 235-56.
36. Jones, T.M. (1995), “Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 404-37.
37. Jones, T.M. and Wicks, A.C. (1999), “Convergent stakeholder theory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 206-21.
38. Katz, R. and Kahn, R.L. (1966, 1978), The Social Psychology of Organisations, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
39. Konrad, A. (1982), “Business managers and moral sanctuary”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 1, pp. 195-200.
40. Kreiner, P. and Bambir, A. (1991), “Influence and information in organisation – stakeholder relationships”, in Post, J.E. (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 3-36.
41. Lépineux, F. (2003), “Dans quelle mesure une entreprise peut-elle être responsable à l’égard de la cohésion sociale?”, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, CNAM, Paris.
42. MacIntyre, A. (1984), After Virtue, Duckworth, Londres, Après la vertu, PUF, Paris, 1997.
43. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A. and Scheeweis, T. (1988), “Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 354-72.
44. Mercier, S. (1999), L’éthique dans les entreprises, Editions La Découverte, collection “Repères”, Paris.
45. Mintzberg, H. (1987), Structure et dynamique des organisations, Editions d’Organisation, Paris.
46. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997), “Toward a theory of stakeholders identification and salience: defining the principles of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 833-86.
47. Mouffe, C. (1994), Le politique et ses enjeux – pour une démocratie plurielle, La Découverte/MAUSS, Paris.
48. Pelle Culpin C.I. (1998), “Du paradoxe de la diffusion d’informations environnementales par les entreprises européennes”, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Paris IX Dauphine.
49. Pesqueux, Y. (2001), “Des histoires à l’histoire dans la formation de la stratégie”, Le management stratégique en représentation, DRISSE (Ed.), Ellipses.
50. Pesqueux, Y. (2002), Organisations: modèles et représentations, PUF, Paris.
51. Phillips, R., Freeman, R.E. and Wicks, A.C. (2003), “What stakeholder theory is not?”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 4.
52. Preston, L.E. and Shapienza, H.J. (1990), “Stakeholder management and corporate performance”, Journal of Behavioural Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 361-75.
53. Preston, L.E., Sapienza, H.J., Miller, R.D. (1991), “Stakeholders, shareholders, managers: who gains what from corporate performance?”, in Etzioni, A. and Lawrence, P.R. (Eds), Socio-Economics: Toward a New Synthesis, M.E. Sharp, Armonk, New York, NY, pp. 149-65.
54. Sandel, M. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press.
55. Quinn, D. and Jones, T. (1995), “An agent morality view of business policy”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 22-42.
56. Rawls, J. (1987), Théorie de la justice, Seuil, Paris.
57. Ricur, P. (1997), L’idéologie et l’utopie, Seuil, Collection “la couleur des idées”, Paris.
58. Tocqueville, A. de (1835), “De la démocratie en Amérique”, Garnier Flammarion, Paris, pp. 353-54.
59. Ullmann, A.A. (1985), “Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 540-57.
60. Waddock, S.A. and Boyle, M.E. (1995), “The dynamic of change in corporate community relations”, California Management Review, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 125-40.
61. Walzer, M. (1983), Spheres of Justice – A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, Basic Books, New York, NY.
62. Walzer, M. (1998), “Traité sur la tolérance”, Gallimard, collection NRF essais, Paris.
63. Weaver, G.R. and Trevino, L.K. (1994), “Normative and empirical business ethics”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4, pp. 129-44.
64. Weaver, G.R., Trevino, L.K. and Cochran, P.L. (1999), “In press corporate ethics programs as control systems: influences of executive commitment and environment factors”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2
65. Weber, M. (1990), “L’éthique protestante et l’esprit du capitalisme”, Presses Pocket, collection “Agora” No. 8, Paris.
66. Williamson, O.E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York, NY.
67. Willis, P. (1977), Learning to Labour. How Working-Class Kids get Working-Class Jobs, Oxford University.