Thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve survival in myocardial infarction complicated by hypotension and suspected cardiogenic shock or heart failure: Results of the TACTICS trial

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 33-39

  Magnus, Ohman E ^a   Nanas, John ^b   Stomel, Robert J ^c   Leesar, Massoud A ^d   Nielsen, Dennis W T ^e   O'Dea, Daniel ^f   Rogers, Felix J ^g   Harber, Daniel ^h   Hudson, Michael P ⁱ   Fraulo, Elizabeth ^j   Shaw, Linda K ^j   Lee, Kerry L ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^c Botsford Hospital   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^e STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^f Hudson Valley Heart Center   (United States)

^g Riverside Osteopathic Hospital   (United States)

^h Garden City Hospital   (United States)

ⁱ HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^j DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiogenic shock; Fibrinolysis; Heart failure

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ALTEPLASE; HEPARIN; STREPTOKINASE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA BALLOON; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOT LYSIS; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNTERPULSATION; DETERIORATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE;

AGED; CAUSE OF DEATH; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE, CONGESTIVE; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMPING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RECURRENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;

EID: 21844434470     PISSN: 09295305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-005-0938-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, Gurwitz J, Bigelow C, Gore JM. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1162-1168. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401504
2. Becker RC, Gore JM, Lambrew C, et al. A composite view of cardiac rupture in the United States National registry of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1321-1326. 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00008-3
3. Eltchaninoff H, Simpfendorfer C, Franco I, Raymond RE, Casale PN, Whitlow PL. Early and 1-year survival rates in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 1995;130:459-464. 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90352-6
4. Ohman EM, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. An analysis of the cause of early mortality after administration of thrombolytic therapy. Coron Artery Dis 1993;4:957-964. 1:STN:280:ByuB38fgtFU%3D
5. Lee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality in the thrombolytic era. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. Circulation 1995;91:1659-1668. 1:STN:280:ByqC1cfjtF0%3D
6. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999;341:625-634. 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901
7. Webb JG. Interventional management of cardiogenic shock. Can J Cardiol 1998;14:233-244. 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7otFCktQ%3D%3D
8. Prewitt RM, Gu S, Schick U, Ducas J. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation enhances coronary thrombolysis induced by intravenous administration of a thrombolytic agent. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:794-798. 1:STN:280:ByuC2Mjis1w%3D
9. Prewitt RM, Gu S, Schick U, Ducas J. Effect of a mechanical vs a pharmacologic increase in aortic pressure on coronary blood flow and thrombolysis induced by IV administration of a thrombolytic agent. Chest 1997;111:449-453. 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXit1alu7s%3D
10. Gurbel PA, Anderson RD, MacCord CS, et al. Arterial diastolic pressure augmentation by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation enhances the onset of coronary artery reperfusion by thrombolytic therapy. Circulation 1994;89:361-365. 1:STN:280:ByuC3cbgtl0%3D
11. Nanas JN, Nanas SN, Kontoyannis DA, et al. Myocardial salvage by the use of reperfusion and intraaortic balloon pump: Experimental study. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:629-634. 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00971-X
12. Stomel RJ, Rasak M, Bates E. Treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in a community hospital. Chest 1994;105:997-1002. 1:STN:280:ByuB3Mrkt1Q%3D
13. Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Tatineni S, et al. Enhanced coronary blood flow velocity during intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in critically ill patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:359-368. 1:STN:280:ByyC2cjjslY%3D
14. Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: 1999 update. Available at http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/nov96/1999/index.htm. Accessed on 29 November 2002.
15. Killip T III, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol 1967;20:457-464. 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90023-9
16. Kovack PJ, Rasak MA, Bates ER, Ohman EM, Stomel RJ. Thrombolysis plus aortic counterpulsation: Improved survival in patients who present to community hospitals with cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1454-1458. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)82537-5
17. Anderson RD, Ohman EM, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock: Observations from the GUSTO-I study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:708-715. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00227-1
18. Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, et al. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J 2001;141:933-939. 10.1067/mhj.2001.115295
19. Bengtson JR, Kaplan AJ, Pieper KS, et al. Prognosis in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction in the interventional era. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1482-1489. 1:STN:280:ByyD1crgsFE%3D
20. Ohman EM, Hochman JS. Aortic counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: Physiologically important but does the patient benefit? Am Heart J 2001;141:889-892. 10.1067/mhj.2001.115296