Is routine endoanal ultrasound useful in anal fistulas?;¿Es útil la ecografía endoanal de rutina en las fístulas perianales?

Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 323-327

  Pascual Migueláñez, Isabel ^a,c   Garcia Olmo D ^a   Martinez Puente M C ^b   Pascual Montero, J A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Instituto Coloproctológico   (Spain)

^c C Costa Brava   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anal fistula; Endoanal ultrasonography; Hydrogen peroxide

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE;

ANUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOANAL ULTRASONGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MECHANICAL PROBE; PERIANAL ABSCESS;

EID: 21744455556     PISSN: 11300108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4321/S1130-01082005000500004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976; 63: 1-12.
2. Navarro-Luna, García-Domingo MI, Rius-Macias J, Marco-Molina C. Ultrasound study of anal fistulas with hydrogen peroxide enhancement. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (1): 108-14.
3. Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound in the assessment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41 (9): 1147-52.
4. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendáriz P, Jiménez G. Valor de la ecografía endoanal con inyección de agua oxigenada en el diagnóstico de las fístulas perianales. Cir Esp 2002; 72 (6): 315-7.
5. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Jiménez G, De Miguel M. Accuracy of hydrogen-enhanced ultrasound in the identification of internal openings of anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4 (4): 280-3.
6. Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Poen AC, Cuesta MA. Assessment and classification of never operated and recurrent cryptoglandular fistulas-in-ano using hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3 (6): 422-6.
7. García Olmo D, Usero Rebollo S, Cifuentes Tebar J, Cascales Sánchez P, López Fando J. Recognition of internal openings in perianal fistulas. A comparison of three procedures. Dig Surg 1995; 12: 245-6.
8. Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Williams AB, Cohen CR, Tarroni D, Phillips RK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for primary fistula in ano. Br J Surg 2003; 90 (7): 877-81.
9. Bartram C, Buchanan G. Imaging anal fistula. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41 (2): 443-57.
10. Schaefer O, Lohrmann C, Langer M. Assessment of anal fistulas with high-resolution subtraction MR-fistulography: comparison with surgical findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19 (1): 91-8.
11. García Montes JM, Caunedo Álvarez A, Herrerías Gutiérrez JM. Utility of the endo-rectal ultrasonography with sectorial transducer in the study of rectoanal pathology. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2001; 93 (8): 509-18.
12. Ortiz H, Martí Ragué J, Chocarro C, de Miguel M. Fístulas perianales. En: Martí-Ragué J, Lledó S, Ortiz H. Actualización en Patología Anorrectal. Barcelona: Ed. J.R. Prous Editores, 1992. p. 111-31.
13. Malouf AJ, Buchanan GN, Carapeti EA, Rao S, Guy RJ, Westcott E, et al. A prospective audit of fistula-in-ano at St. Mark's hospital. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4 (1): 13-9.
14. García Olmo D, Jiménez Romero C. Sinus pilonidal. En: Martí-Ragué J, Lledó S, Ortiz H. Actualización en Patología Anorrectal. Barcelona: Ed. J.R. Prous Editores, 1992. p. 133-54.
15. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI. Pilonidal sinus disease: MR imaging distinction from fistula in ano. Radiology 2003; 226 (3): 662-7.
16. Vallance S. Pilonidal fistulas mimicking fistulas-in-ano. Br J Surg 1982; 69 (3): 161-2.
17. García-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Maddoff RD. Anal fistula surgery. Factor associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (7): 723-9.