Energy analysis of human stumbling: The limitations of recovery

Gait and Posture

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 243-254

  Cordero, A Forner ^a,b   Koopman, H J F M ^a   Van Der Helm, F C T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Energy analysis; Gait perturbation; Recovery strategy; Stumbling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; ENERGY; ENERGY ABSORPTION; GAIT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREADMILL; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; ENERGY METABOLISM; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WALKING;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; ENERGY METABOLISM; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WALKING;

EID: 21744450768     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 1995;3:193-214.
2. Pavol MJ, Owings TM, Foley KT, Grabiner MD. Gait characteristics as risk factors for falling from trips induced in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999;54(11):M583-90.
3. Dietz V, Quintern J, Boos G, Berger W. Obstruction of the swing phase during gait: phase-dependent bilateral leg muscle coordination. Brain Res 1986;384(1):166-9.
4. Dietz V, Quintern J, Sillem M. Stumbling reactions in man: significance of proprioceptive and pre-programmed mechanisms. J Physiol 1987;386:149-63.
5. Eng JJ, Winter DA, Patla AE. Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking. Exp Brain Res 1994;102:339-49.
6. Schillings AM, Van Wezel BM, Duysens J. Mechanically induced stumbling during human treadmill walking. J Neurosci Methods 1996;67:11-7.
7. Forner Cordero A, Koopman B, van der Helm FCT. Multiple-step strategies to recover from stumbling perturbations. Gait Posture 2003;18:47-59.
8. Schillings AM, van Wezel BM, Mulder T, Duysens J. Muscular responses and movement strategies during stumbling over obstacles. J Neurophysiol 2000;83(4):2093-102.
9. McGibbon CA, Krebs DE, Puniello MS. Mechanical energy analysis identifies compensatory strategies in disabled elders' gait. J Biomech 2001;34(4):481-90.
10. Koopman B, Grootenboer HJ, de Jongh HJ. An inverse dynamics model for the analysis. J Biomech 1995;28(11):1369-76.
11. Forner Cordero A, Koopman, B, van der Helm FCT. Estimation of the ground reaction forces and torques from the motion data and pressure insoles. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on the 3-D Analysis of Human Movement, Newcastle upon Tyne, University of Newcastle, UK; July 2002.
12. Forner Cordero A, Koopman B, van der Helm FCT. Use of pressure insoles to calculate the complete ground reaction forces. J Biomech, in press.
13. Forner Cordero A, van der Helm FCT, Koopman B. Gait as a sequence of states: a new method for the analysis of gait. Gait Posture 2002;16(Suppl 1):S153-4.
14. Eng JJ, Winter DA. Kinetic analysis of the lower limbs during walking: what information can be gained from a three-dimensional model? J Biomech 1995;28:753-8.
15. Pavol MJ, Owings TM, Foley KT, Grabiner MD. Mechanisms leading to a fall from an induced trip in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56(7):M428-37.
16. van den Bogert AJ, Pavol MJ, Grabiner MD. Response time is more important than walking speed for the ability of older adults to avoid a fall after a trip. J Biomech 2002;35:199-205.
17. Mochon S, McMahon TA. Ballistic walking. J Biomech 1980;13:49-57.
18. Grabiner MD, Davis BL. Footwear and balance in older men. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:1011-2.
19. Grabiner MD, Feuerbach JW, Jahnigen DW. Measures of paraspinal muscle performance do not predict initial trunk kinematics after tripping. J Biomech 1996;29:735-44.