GPs' perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients' adherence to treatment: A qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Wens, Johan ^a   Vermeire, Etienne ^a   Van Royen, Paul ^a   Sabbe, Bernard ^a   Denekens, Joke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXAMINATION; EXPECTATION; EXPERIENCE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRUSTRATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIFESTYLE; MALE; METABOLIC REGULATION; MOTIVATION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; NURSE; NURSING EDUCATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATERNALISM; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRESSURE; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECOGNITION; SCIENCE; SELF CONCEPT; SHOCK; TAPE RECORDER; TEAMWORK; THINKING; THREAT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BELGIUM; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BELGIUM; COMMUNICATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 21744449304     PISSN: 14712296     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-20     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Wens J, Van Casteren V, Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Pas L, Denekens J: Diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes in three Belgian regions. Registration via a network of sentinel general practices. Eur J Epidemiol 2001, 17(8):743-50.
2. American Diabetes Association: Screening for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003, 26(Suppl 1):S21-S24.
3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998, 352:837-853.
4. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998, 352:854-865.
5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 38). BMJ 1998, 317:703-713.
6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of both macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 39). BMJ 1998, 317:713-720.
7. Anon: Working Party from Complinace to concordance. Achieving goals in medicine taking. London, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain 1997.
8. Morris LS, Schulz RM: Patient compliance: an overview. J Clin Pharm Ther 1992, 17:283-295.
9. Sackett DL, Snow JC: The magnitude of compliance and non-compliance. In Compliance in Health Care Edited by: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press; 1979.
10. Griffith S: A review of the factors associated with compliance and the taking of prescribed medicines. British Journal of General Practice 1990, 40:114-116.
11. Roberson MHB: The meaning of compliance: patient perspectives. Qualitative Health Research 1992, 2:7-22.
12. Alogna M: Perceptions of severity of disease and health locus of control in compliant and non compliant diabetes patients. Diabetes Care 1980, 3:533-534.
13. Boom CAB, Hart LK: The relationship between the health belief model and compliance of persons with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1980, 3:594-598.
14. Cahill J: Patient participation: a concept analysis. J Advanced nursing 1996, 24:561-571.
15. Bissell P, May CR, Noyce PR: From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions. Social Science & Medicine 2004, 58(4):851-62.
16. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al.: Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ 2001, 322(7284):468-472.
17. Lagro-Janssen ALM, Van der Werf G Th: Hoe spreken huisartsen en hun patiënten over ziekte? Een zoektocht in de medische literatuur naar het ziektebegrip van huisartsen en patiënten. Huisarts en Wetenschap 1999, 42(12):539-544.
18. Anderson RM, Robins LS: How do we know? Reflections on qualitative research in diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998, 21:1387-1388.
19. Murri R, Antinori A, Ammassari A, Nappa S, Orofino G, Abrescia N, Mussini C, D'Arminio Monforte A, Wu AW, AdICoNA Study Group: Physician estimates of adherence and the patient-physician relationship as a setting to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002, 31(Suppl 3):S158-62.
20. Hunt LM, Arar NH: An analytical framework for contrasting patient and provider views of the process of chronic disease management. Med Anthropol Q 2001, 15(3):347-67.
21. Trestle JA: Medical compliance as an ideology. Soc Sci Med 1988, 27(12):1299-308.
22. Morgan DL, Krueger RA: "Focus Group Kit" parts 1 to 6. SAGE Publications; 1997. ISBN 0-7619-0760-2
23. Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative Research. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995, 311(6997):109-112.
24. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 1998, 2(16):. iii-ix, 1-274
25. Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Coenen S, Wens J, Denekens : The adherence of type 2 diabetes patients to their therapeutic regimens: patients' perspective. A qualitative study. Pract Diabetes Int 2003, 20(6):209-214.
26. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denkens J: Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001, 26:1-12.
27. Krueger RA: Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1988.
28. Morgan DL: Designing focus group research. In Tools for primary care research Edited by: Stewart M, Tudiver F, Bass MJ, Dunn EV, Norton PG. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publication; 1992.
29. Cramer JA: A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004, 27:1218-1224.
30. Burke LE, Fair J: Promoting prevention: skill sets and attributes of health care providers who deliver behavioral interventions. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2003, 18(4):256-266.
31. Botelho RJ, Novak S: Dealing with substance misuse, abuse, and dependency. Prim Care 1993, 20(1):51-70.
32. Heszen-Klemens I: Patients' non-compliance and how doctors manage this. Soc Sci Med 1987, 24(5):409-416.
33. Griffin S, Kinmonth AL: Systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes mellitus (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library Issue 1 Oxford: Update Software; 2003.
34. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, Wagner EH, Eijk JThM van, Assendelft WJJ: Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library Issue 1 Oxford: Update Software; 2003.
35. Van den Arend IJ, Stolk RP, Krans HM, Grobbee DE, Schrijvers AJ: Management of type 2 diabetes: a challenge for patient and physician. [Review]. Patient Education & Counseling 2000, 40(2):187-94.
36. Alazri MH, Neal RD: The association between satisfaction with services provided in primary care and outcomes in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine 2003, 20(6):486-90.
37. Mead N, Bower P, Hann M: The impact of general practitioners' patient-centredness on patients' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Social Science & Medicine 2002, 55(2):283-299.
38. Lewin SA, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J: Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. [Systematic Review]. Cochrane Consumers & Communication Group Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004.
39. Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell MJ: Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. BMJ 1998, 317:1202-1208.
40. Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, Ubel PA, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP: When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what differences does it make? Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003, 18(11):893-902.
41. Demmer C: Relationship with health care provider and adherence to HIV medications. Psychological reports 2003, 93(2):494-496.
42. Demyttenaere K: Risk factors and predictors of compliance in depression. Review. European Neuropsychopharmacology 2003, 13(suppl 3):S69-75.
43. Brown JB, Harris SB, Webster-Bogaert S, Wetmore S, Faulds C, Stewart M: The role of patient, physician and systemic factors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Family Practice 2002, 19(4):344-349.
44. Pope C, Van Royen P, Baker R: Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual Saf Health Care 2002, 11:148-152.
45. Health Survey Interview :36 [http://www.iph.fgov.be/epidemio/epien/ index4.htm]. Gezondheidsenquête door middel van interview
46. Krupat E, Stein T, Selby JV, Yeager CM, Schmittdiel J: Choice of a primary care physician and its relationship to adherence among patients with diabetes. Am J Manag Care 2002, 8(9):777-84.
47. Donovan JL: Patient decision making. The missing ingredient in complex research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995, 11:443-455.