How much is enough to accept hormesis as the default? or 'At what point, if ever, could/should hormesis be employed as the principal dose-response default assumption in risk assessment?'

Human and Experimental Toxicology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 245-247

  Jayjock, Michael A ^a  

^a LifeLine Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Genomics; Hormesis; Low dose response; Proteinomics; Toxicology

Indexed keywords

DOSE RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GENOMICS; HORMESIS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SHORT SURVEY;

ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; PROTEOMICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 21744444057     PISSN: 09603271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0960327105ht519oa     Document Type: Short Survey

References (1)

1. Jayjock MA, Lewis PG, Lynch JR. Quantitative level of protection offered to workers by ACGIH threshold limit values (TLV®) occupational exposure limits. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2001; 62: 4-11.