Evaluating social work: Progress and prospects

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 291-310

  Cheetham, Juliet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21744442673     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973159700700301     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Addison, C. (1988). Planning investigative projects: A workbook for social services practitioners. London: National Institute of Social Work.
2. Atkin, K., & Rollings, J. (1993). Community care in multi-racial Britain. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
3. Austin, D. (1992). Findings of the NIMH Task Force on social work research. Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 311-322.
4. Bartlett, H. (1970). The common base of social work practice. New York: National Association of Social Workers Press.
5. Bordnick, P. S. (1997). Trichotillomania: Asocial worker's guide to practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 216-227.
6. Brannen, J. (Ed.). (1993). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Aldershot, UK: Avebury Press.
7. British Journal of Social Work. (1997). Special issue, vol. 17 (6).
8. Cheetham, J. (1992). Evaluating social work effectiveness. Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 265-287.
9. Cheetham J., Fuller, R., McIvor, G., & Petch, A. (1992). Evaluating social work effectiveness. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
10. Cheetham, J., & Kazi, M. (in press). The working of social work. London: Jessica Kingsley.
11. Cocks, E., & Cockram, J. (1995). The participatory research paradigm and intellectual disability. Mental Handicap Research, 8, 25-37.
12. Connell, J., Kubisch, A., Schon, L., & Weiss, C. (Eds.). (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Contexts, methods and contents. Washington, D.C.: Aspen Institute.
13. Connor, A. (1993). Monitoring and evaluation made easy. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
14. Davies, B. (1992). Care management, equity and efficiency: The international experience. Canterbury, UK: University of Canterbury, Personal Social Services Research Unit.
15. Davies, B., Bebbington, A., & Chamley, H. (with Baines, B., Ferlie, E., Hughes, M., & Twigg, J.). (1990). Resources, needs and outcomes in community-based care. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
16. Department of Health. (1994). A wider strategy for research and development in the personal social sciences. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
17. Draine, J. (1997). Acritical review of randomized field trials of case management for individuals with serious and persistent mental illness. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 32-52.
18. Everitt, A. (1996). Critical evaluation. Evaluation, 2, 173-188.
19. Everitt, A., & Hardiker, P. (1996). Evaluating for good practice. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
20. Thyer, B. (1992a). Promoting evaluation research in the field of family prevention. In E. S. Morton & R. K. Grigsby (Eds.), Advancing family prevention practice (pp. 131-149). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Thyer, B. (1992b). Single system designs. In R. M. Grinnell (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation (4th ed., pp. 94-117). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
22. Thyer, B. (1993). Social work theory and practice research: The approach of logical positivism. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 4,5-26.
23. Thyer, B. A. (1996). Forty years of progress towards empirical clinical practice. Social Work Research, 20, 77-81.
24. Thyer, B. A., Isaac, A., & Larkin, R. (1997). Integrating research and practice. In M. Reisch & E. Gambrill (Eds.), Social work practice in the 21st century (pp. 311-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
25. Thyer, B. A., & Wodarski, J. S. (Eds.), (in press). Handbook of empirical social work practice: Vol. 1. Mental disorders. New York: John Wiley.
26. Tozer, R., & Thomton, P. (1995). A meeting of minds: Older people as research advisors. York, UK: University of York, Social Policy Research Unit.
27. Twigg, J., Atkin, K., & Perring, C. (1990). Carers and services: A review of research. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
28. Ward, H. (1995). Looking after children: Research into practice. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
29. Ward, H. (1996). Constructing and implementing measures designed to assess outcomes in child care. In M. Hall & J. Aldgate (Eds.), Child welfare services. London: Jessica Kingsley.
30. Whittaker, A. (1994). Service evaluation by people with learning difficulties. In A. Connor & S. Black (Eds.), Performance review and quality in social care. London: Jessica Kingsley.
31. Yates, B. (1996). Analyzing costs, procedures, processes and outcomes in human sciences. London: Sage.