Procedure and power

Journal of Legal Education

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 513-517

  Burbank, Stephen B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21744433272     PISSN: 00222208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. See Stephen B. Burbank, The Costs of Complexity, 85 Mich. L. Rev. 1463 (1987).
2. See Stephen B. Burbank, The Chancellor's Boot, 54 Brook. L. Rev. 31 (1988).
3. See Stephen B. Burbank, The Rules Enabling Act of 1934, 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1015 (1982).
4. See Stephen B. Burbank, The Transformation of American Civil Procedure: The Example of Rule 11, 137 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1925 (1989);
5. Stephen C. Yeazell, The Misunderstood Consequences of Modern Civil Process, 1994 Wis. L. Rev. 631.
6. See Burbank, supra note 1, at 1476-79;
7. Burbank, supra note 4, at 1944-47.
8. See Bryant G. Garth, From Civil Litigation to Private Justice: Legal Practice at War with the Profession and Its Values, 59 Brook. L. Rev. 931 (1993).
9. See Judicial Preferences, Public Choice, and the Rules of Procedure, 23 J. Legal Stud. 627 (1994);
10. Janet Cooper Alexander, Judges' Self-interest and Procedural Rules: Comment on Macey, 23 J. Legal Stud. 647 (1994).
11. Burbank, supra note 1, at 1478.
12. See Stephen B. Burbank, Proposals to Amend Rule 68: Time to Abandon Ship, 19 U. Mich. J. L. Ref. 425 (1986).
13. See Pub. L. No. 100-702, tit. IV
14. Stat. 4642, 4648-52 (1988).
15. See Stephen B. Burbank, Ignorance and Procedural Law Reform: A Call for a Moratorium, 59 Brook. L. Rev. 841 (1993).
16. 28 U. S. C. §§ 471-482.
17. See S. 2212, 103d Cong. (1994).
18. See Burbank, supra note 11, at 845-46.
19. Pub. L. No. 104-67, 109 Stat. 737 (1995).
20. Indeed, having woken up to the need to reach a truce with the practicing bar, the rulemakers appear to be nodding off again. The proposal to return to a norm of twelve-person civil juries was scrapped by the Judicial Conference, and the proposal to permit greater participation of counsel in voir dire as of right did not even get that far.
21. See Marc Galanter et al., How to Improve Civil Justice Policy, 77 Judicature 185 (1994).