Overwriting does not optimize in nonconcatenative morphology

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 275-287

  Nevins, Andrew Ira ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fixed Segment Reduplication; Hebrew denominal verb formation; Hindi echo reduplication; Melodic Overwriting; Shm reduplication

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644486831     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/0024389053710693     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Alderete, John, Jill Beckman, Laura Benua, Amalia Gnanadesikan, John McCarthy, and Suzanne Urbanczyk. 1999. Reduplication with fixed segmentism. Linguistic Inquiry 30:327-364.
2. Arad, Maya. 2003. Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21:737-778.
3. Besten, Hans den. 1996. Associative DPs. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996, ed. by Crit Cremers and Marcel den Dikken, 13-24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Fitzpatrick, Justin, and Andrew Nevins. To appear. Phonological occurrences: Relations and copying. In Papers presented at the 2nd North American Phonology Conference. Available at http://theoling.auf.net (paper no.: LingBuzz/000051).
5. Kelepir, Meltem. 2000. To be or not to be faithful. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, ed. by Ash Göksel and Celia Kerslake. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
6. Lidz, Jeffrey. 2001. Echo formation in Kannada and the theory of word formation. The Linguistic Review 18:375-394.
7. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1999. Faithfulness and identity in Prosodic Morphology. In The prosodymorphology interface, ed. by René Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 218-309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Nakanishi, Kimiko, and Satoshi Tomioka. 2004. Japanese plurals are exceptional. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13:113-140.
9. Nevins, Andrew, and Bert Vaux. 2003a. Metalinguistic, shmetalinguistic: The phonology and morphology of shm- reduplication. In CLS 39. Results of an online survey: http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/shm.
10. Nevins, Andrew, and Bert Vaux. 2003b. Underdetermination in language games: Survey and analysis of Pig Latin dialects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Atlanta.
11. Raimy, Eric. 2000. The phonology and morphology of reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Singh, Amar Bahadur. 1969. On echo words in Hindi. Indian Linguistics 30:185-195.
13. Ussishkin, Adam. 1997. The inadequacy of the consonantal root: Modern Hebrew, denominal verbs, and output-output correspondence. Phonology 16:401-442.
14. Ussishkin, Adam. 2000. The emergence of fixed prosody. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
15. Walther, Markus. 2001. Correspondence theory: More candidates than atoms in the universe. Marburger Arbeiten zur Linguistik 6. Available at http://pc0880.germanistik-kunst.uni-marburg.de/mal/MAL-TEXTS-archive/6-0301/.