Ergonomics of digital imaging

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 78, Issue 931, 2005, Pages 582-586

  Prabhu, S P ^a   Gandhi, S ^b   Goddard, P R ^a  

^a BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b FRENCHAY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DIGITAL COMPUTER; E-MAIL; ERGONOMICS; EYE DISEASE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERNET; LIGHT INTENSITY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; REVIEW; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TELECOMMUNICATION; THERMOREGULATION; UNITED KINGDOM; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

COMPUTER TERMINALS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OPTOMETRY; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 21644486679     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/51650129     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Lam DS, Cheuk W, Leung AT, et al. Eye care when using video display terminals. Hong Kong Med J 1999;5:255-7.
2. Marriott IA, Stuchly MA. Health aspects of work with visual display terminals. J Occup Med 1986;28:833-48.
3. McCollough C. Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science 1965;149:1115-6.
4. Ong CN. Musculoskeletal disorders in operators of visual display terminals. World Health Forum 1994;15:161-4.
5. Horii SC. Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface. Radiographics 1992;12:773-87.
6. Burgess-Limerick R, Plooy A, Ankrum DR. The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1998;13:584-92.
7. Display screen equipment work - Guidance on Regulations-10th Impression Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Publications. 1997.
8. Siegel E, Reiner B. Radiology reading room design: the next generation. Appl Radiol 2002;4:11-6.
9. Mehta A, Dreyer K, Boland G, Frank M. Do picture archiving and communication systems improve report turn-around times? J Digit Imaging 2000;13(2 Suppl 1):105-7.
10. Redfern RO, Horii SC, Feingold E, Kundel HL. Radiology workflow and patient volume: effect of picture archiving and communication systems on technologists and radiologists. J Digit Imaging 2000;13(2 Suppl 1):97-100.
11. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:861-4.
12. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ. Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1407-10.
13. Pijl ME, Wasser MN, et al. Metastases of colorectal carcinoma: comparison of soft- and hard-copy helical CT interpretation. Radiology 2003;227:747-51.
14. Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins, Roddie M, Keen J, Muris N, et al. Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1153-9.
15. Siegel E, Reiner B, Abiri M, Chacko A, Morin R, Ro DW, et al. The filmless radiology reading room: a survey of established picture archiving and communication system sites J Digit Imaging. 2000;13(2 Suppl 1):22-3.
16. Rumreich LL, Johnson AJ. From traditional reading rooms to a soft copy environment: radiologist satisfaction survey. J Digit Imaging 2003;16:262-9. Epub 2003 Dec 15.
17. Bennett WF, Vaswani KK, Mendiola JA, Spigos DG. PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques. J Digit Imaging 2002;15 Suppl 1:171-4.
18. Watkins J. A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. Eur J Radiol 1999;32:106-12.
19. Hayt DB, Alexander S. The pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging 2001;14:149-57.