Evaluation of image quality of the Iso C 3D image intensifier in comparison to computer tomography. Use in the pelvic area;Evaluation der bildqualität des Iso-C 3D-bildwandlers im vergleich mit dem CT. Diagnostik und therapie im beckenbereich

Unfallchirurg

Volumn 108, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 378-386

  Konig B ^a   Erdmenger, U ^a   Schroder R J ^a   Wienas, G ^a   Schaefer, J ^a   Pech, M ^a   Stockle U ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fluoroscopy; Image quality; Intraoperative imaging; Iso C; Pelvic surgery; Siremobil

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BODY MASS; BONE SCREW; BONE STRUCTURE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR NECK; HUMAN; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; IMAGE QUALITY; IMPLANT; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PELVIS; PELVIS SURGERY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RADIOLOGIST; RATING SCALE; SACROILIAC JOINT; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD; SURGEON; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CADAVER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PELVIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 21644485330     PISSN: 01775537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-004-0900-1     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. 3D. electromedica 70: 64-67
2. 3D-Bildgebung am Talus. Unfallchirurg 104: 839-846
3. Gebhard F, Kraus M et al. (2003) Strahlendosis im OP - ein Vergleich computerassistierter Verfahren. Unfallchirurg 106: 492-497
4. 3D). Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174: 170-176
5. 3D). Unfallchirurg 104: 827-833