Numerical modeling of surface waves over shallow cavities

Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 111-121

  Gelis, C ^a,b   Leparoux, D ^c   Virieux, J ^a   Bitri, A ^b   Operto, S ^a   Grandjean, G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

^b BRGM   (France)

^c INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; RAYLEIGH SCATTERING; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOGRAPHS; SOIL MECHANICS; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT; WAVE PROPAGATION;

MODELING; RAYLEIGH WAVES; SEISMOGRAMS; SHALLOW CAVITIES;

SURFACE WAVES;

NUMERICAL MODEL; SURFACE WAVE;

EID: 21644471210     PISSN: 10831363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2113/JEEG10.2.111     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bérenger, J.-P., 1994, A Perfectly Matched Layer for the Absorption of Electromagnetic Waves: Journal of computational physics, 114, 185-200.
2. th Meeting EEGS, Barcelona, Spain, 503-506.
3. Blonk, B., Herman, G.C., and Drijkoningen, G.G., 1995, An elastodynamic inverse scattering method for removing scattered surface waves from field data: Geophysics, 60(6) 1897-1905.
4. Bohlen, T., and Saenger, E.H., 2003, 3-D visco-elastic finite-difference modeling using the rotated staggered grid - tests of numerical accuracy: EAGE 65th Conference & Exhibition. Stavanger, Norway, 2-5 June 2003.
5. rd Annual International Meeting Society of Exploration Geophysics, Expended abstracts, 1897-1900.
6. Chew, W.C., and et Liu, Q.H., 1996, Perfectly Matched Layers for elastodynamics: a new absorbing boundary condition: Journal of Computational Geophysics, 4(4) 341-359.
7. Ernst, F.E., and Herman, G.C., 1998, Removal of guided waves from seismic data in laterally varying media: Wave motion, 28, 173-189.
8. Ganji, V., Gucunski, N., and Maher, A., 1997, Detection of underground obstacles by SASW method - numerical aspects: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123, 212-219.
9. Garvin, W.W., 1956, Exact transient solution of the buried line source problem: Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series A, 234, 528-541.
10. Grandjean, G., and Leparoux, D., 2004, The potential of seismic methods for detecting cavities and buried objects: Experimentation at a test site: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 56, 93-106.
11. Hastings, F.D., Schneider, J.B., and et Broschat, S.L., 1996, Application of the perfectly matched layer (PML) absorbing boundary condition to elastic wave propagation: Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 100(5) 3061-3069.
12. Herman, G.C., Milligan, P.A., Huggins, R.J., and Rector, J.W., 2000, Imaging shallow objects and heterogeneities with scattered guided waves: Geophysics 65(1) 247-252.
13. Hévin, G., Abraham, O., Pedersen, H.A., and Campillo, M., 1998, Characterization of surface cracks with Rayleigh waves: A numerical model: NDT & E Internat., 31, 289-297.
14. Komatitsch, 1997, Méthodes spectrales et éléments spectraux pour l'équation de l'élastodynamique 2D et 3D en milieu hétérogène. Thèse de doctorat (Ph.D. thesis) en Sismologie, IPGP, Paris.
15. Léonard, C., 2000, Détection des cavités souterraines par sismique haute resolution et par Impact-Echo. Thèse de doctorat (Ph.D. thesis) en Génie Civil, Lille.
16. Leparoux, D., Bitri, A., and Grandjean, G., 2000, Underground cavity detection: A new method based on seismic Rayleigh waves: European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 5, 33-53.
17. Nazarian, S., and Stokoe II, K.H., 1984, In situ shear wave velocities from spectral analysis of surface waves, Proc. 8th Conf. on Earthquake Eng. - S. Francisco, 3, 31-38.
18. Ohminato, T., and Chouet, B., 1997, A free surface boundary condition for including 3D topography in the finite difference method: Bulletin of the Seismic Society of America, 87, 494-515.
19. Park, C.B., Miller, R.D., and Xia, J., 1998, Imaging dispersion curves of surface waves on multi-channel record: Soc. Exploration Geophys., New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
20. Park, C.B., Miller, R.D., and Xia, J., 1999, Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW): Geophysics, 64, 800-808.
21. Piwakowski, B., Tricot, J.C., Léonard, C., Ouarradi, N., and Delannoy, B., 1997, Underground tunnels detection and localisation by high resolution seismic reflexion, IIIth Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Aahus, Denmark.
22. th European Meeting of EEGS-EAGE, Prague, Czech Republic. August 31-September 4, 2003.
23. Rix, G.J., Hebeler, G.L., and Orozco, M.C., 2002, Near surface Vs profiling in the New Madrid Seismic Zone Using Surface wave methods: Seismological Research Letters, 73(3) 380-392.
24. Rix, G.J., Lai, C.G., and Foti, S., 2001, Simultaneous measurement of surface wave dispersion and attenuation curves: Geotechnical Testing Journal, 24(4) 350-358.
25. Saenger, E.H., and Bohlen, T., 2004, Finite difference modelling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated grid: Geophysics, 69(2) 583-591.
26. Saenger, E.H., Gold, N., and Shapiro, S.A., 2000, Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid: Wave Motion, 31, 77-92.
27. th meeting Env. Eng. Geophys., European Section, Bochum.
28. Soczkiewicz, E., 1996, Propagation of Rayleigh surface waves and Poisson's ratio of a medium: Acoustics Lett., 19, 223-226.
29. Virieux, J., 1986, P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 51(4) 889-901.