Mix-up: Models of governance and framing opportunities in U.S. and EU consumer policy

Journal of Consumer Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 203-230

  Strünck, Christoph ^a,b  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644467272     PISSN: 01687034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-005-2981-9     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. J. E Beach 1998 No "killer tomatoes": Easing federal regulation of genetically engineered plants Food and Drug Law Journal 53 178-183
2. O Beaud 1999 Le sang contamine Behemoth Paris
3. T Bernauer 2003 Genes, trade, and regulation: The seeds of conflict in food biotechnology Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
4. T Bernauer L Caduff 2004 In whose interest? Pressure group politics, economic competition and environmental competition Journal of Public Policy 24 99-126 10.1017/S0143814X04000054
5. BioSicherheit (2003). Hürden für die Grüne Gentechnik. http://www.biosicherheit.de/aktuell/227.doku.html. 13.09.04
6. Buananno L., Zablotney S., & Keefer R. (2001) Politics versus science in the making of a new regulatory regime for food in Europe. European Integration Online Papers (EioP), 5. http://www.eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-012a.htm. 13.09.04
7. T Cowan 2002 The changing structure of agriculture and rural America. Emerging opportunities and challenges Novinka Books New York
8. F Duina P Kurzer 2004 Smoke in your eyes: The struggle over tobacco control in the European Union Journal of European Public Policy 11 57-77
9. M. A Echols 1998 Food safety regulation in the European Union and the United States: Different cultures, different laws Columbia Journal of European Law 4 525-543
10. M. A Eisner 2000 Regulatory politics in transition 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD
11. European Commission (2003). Smoking and the environment: Actions and attitudes. Special Eurobarometer 183/Wave 58.2. Brussels
12. European Union in the U.S. (2004). EU Commission pushes for GMO "green light." News release, 10. http://www.eurunion.org/news/press/2004/20040010.htm. 14.09.04
13. C Evensen T Hoban E Woodrum 2000 Technology and morality: Influences on public attitudes toward biotechnology Knowledge, Technology and Policy 1 43-57
14. S. A Glantz E. D Balbach 2000 Tobacco war. Inside the California battles University of California Press Berkeley, CA
15. E Grande 1996 The state and interest groups in a framework of multi-level-decision-making: The case of the European Union Journal of European Public Policy 3 318-338
16. C Hodges 2001 Multi-party actions: A European approach Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 11 321-354
17. G Howells T Wilhelmsson 1997 EC consumer law Aldershot Ashgate
18. K. W Hula 1999 Lobbying together. Interest group coalitions in legislative politics Georgetown University Press Washington, DC
19. F. Janning 2004 Der Staat der Konsumenten. Pla7die;doyer für eine politische Theorie des Verbraucherschutzes. In: R. Czada (Ed.), Politik und Markt. Sonderheft 34 der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift VS-Verlag Wiesbaden 151-185
20. S. Jasanoff 1993 American exceptionalism and the political acknowledgment of risk. In: E. J. Burger (Ed.), Risk University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, MI 61-81
21. C Joerges E Vos 1999 EU committees: Social regulation, law, and politics Hart Publishing Oxford
22. C. O Jones 1994 The presidency in a separated system Brookings Institution Washington, DC
23. R. A Kagan 2001 Adversarial legalism. The American way of law Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
24. R. A Kagan W. P. Nelson 2001 The politics of tobacco regulation in the United States. In: R. L. Rabin S. D. Sugarman (Eds.), Regulating tobacco Oxford University Press Oxford 11-38
25. G Majone 1999 The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems West European Politics 22 1-24
26. R. N Mayer 1989 The consumer movement. Guardians of the marketplace Hall/ Twayne Boston: GK
27. D McAdam J McCarthy M. N Zald 1996 Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings Cambridge University Press Cambridge
28. M. D McCubbins T Schwartz 1984 Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms American Journal of Political Science 28 165-179
29. R Merrill J. K Francer 2000 Organizing federal food safety regulation Seton Hall Law Review 31 61-173
30. J. S Mill 1859 On liberty Parker London
31. M Neuman A Bitton S. A Glantz 2002 Tobacco industry strategies for influencing European Community tobacco advertising legislation The Lancet 359 1323-1330
32. NGO-Online (2003) Gentech-Produzent Monsanto schlieβt Niederlassungen http://www.ngo-online.de/ druckfrisch_druckausgabe.php4?Nr=7133&Beitragsauswahl. 18.12.03
33. M Olson 1965 The logic of collective action. Public goods and theory of groups Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
34. M Pertschuk 2001 Smoke in their eyes. Lessons in movement leadership from the tobacco wars Vanderbilt University Press Nashville, TN
35. Philip Morris Companies Inc 2002 Form 10-Q, third quarter 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Government Printing Office Washington, DC
36. R. L. Rabin 2001 The third wave of tobacco tort litigation. In: R. L. Rabin S. D. Sugarman (Eds.), Regulating tobacco Oxford University Press Oxford 176-206
37. R. A Rhodes 1997 Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability Open University Press Buckingham
38. P. H. Schuck 2002 Tort liability. In: L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government. A guide to the new governance Oxford University Press Oxford 466-489
39. D Seidman 1977 Protection or overprotection in drug regulation? The politics of policy analysis Regulation 6 22-37
40. M Shapiro 1997 The problems of independent agencies in the United States and the European Union Journal of European Public Policy 4 276-291
41. E. A Smith R. E Malone 2003 Thinking the "unthinkable": Why Philip Morris considered quitting Tobacco Control 12 208-213 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ltVCjuw%3D%3D 12773733
42. G. J Stigler 1971 The theory of economic regulation Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 3-21
43. C Strünck 2001 Why is there no mad cow disease in the United States? Comparing the politics of food safety in Europe and the United States University of California at Berkeley, Center for German and European Studies. Discussion Paper Berkeley, CA
44. S Tarrow 1996 Power in movement. Social movements, collective action and politics Cambridge University Press Cambridge
45. M. P Traynor S. A Glantz 1996 California's tobacco tax initiative American Journal of Public Health 21 543-585 1:STN:280:BymA2sbht1E%3D
46. G Trumbull 2000 Contested ideas of the consumer: National strategies of product market regulation in France and Germany European University Institute. Working Paper 1 Florence
47. T. H Tsoukalas S. A Glantz 2003 Development and destruction of the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA Tobacco Control 12 214-220 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ltVCisg%3D%3D 12773734
48. D Vogel 1986 National styles of regulation. Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States Cornell University Press Ithaca, NY
49. D Vogel 1989 AIDS and the politics of drug lag Public Interest 96 73-85 10294053
50. D Vogel 1995 Trading up. Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
51. D Vogel 2001 The new politics of risk regulation in Europe London School of Economics and Political Science. London Discussion Paper 3
52. K. E Warner 2000 The economics of tobacco: Myths and realities Tobacco Control 9 78-89 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ls12jsA%3D%3D 10691761
53. WHO 2002 The European Report on tobacco control policy World Health Organization London
54. G. K Wilson 1998 Only in America? The politics of the United States in comparative perspective Chatham House Publishers Chatham, NJ
55. L. B Winn 1999 Special labelling requirements for genetically engineered food: How sound are the analytical frameworks used by FDA and food producers? Food and Drug Law Journal 54 667-688 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FpsFyqtA%3D%3D 11824460