Further examination of the factor integrity of the sport anxiety scale

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 253-260

  Prapavessis, Harry ^a   Maddison, Ralph ^a   Fletcher, Richard ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Competitive anxiety; Item response theory; Scale development

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644466187     PISSN: 08952779     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.27.2.253     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Arbuckle, J.M. (1999). Amos for Windows: Analysis of movement structures. Version 4.01. Chicago: Small Waters Corp.
2. Dunn, J.G.H., & Causgrove Dunn, J. (2001). Relationships among the Sport Competition Anxiety Test, the Sport Anxiety Scale, and Collegiate Hockey Worry Scale. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 411-429.
3. Dunn, J.G.H., Causgrove Dunn, J., Wilson, P., & Syrotuik, D.G. (2000). Reexamining the factorial composition and factorial structure of the Sport Anxiety Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 22, 183-193.
4. Fletcher, R.B., & Hattie, J. A. (2004). An examination of the psychometric properties of the physical self-description questionnaire using a polytomous item response model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 423-446.
5. Hambleton, R.K. (1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (Vol. 3, pp. 147-200). New York: Macmillan.
6. Hambleton, R.K., & Jones, R.W. (1996). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 38-47.
7. Hoyle, R.H., & Panter, A.T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. MacCullum, R., Rosnowski, M., & Necowitz, L.B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on change. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
9. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17.
10. Sarason, I.G., Pierce, G.R., & Sarason, B.R. (1996). Domains of cognitive interference. In I.G. Sarason, G.R. Pierce, & B.R. Sarason (Eds.), Cognitive interference. Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 139-152). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Smith, R.E., Smoll, F.L., & Schutz, R.W. (1990). Measurement and correlates of sport-specific cognitive and somatic trait anxiety: The Sport Anxiety Scale. Anxiety Research, 2. 263-280.
12. Thissen, D. (1990). MULTILOG user's guide (Version 2). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.