Evaluating the impact of information communication technologies on complex organizational systems: a multi-disciplinary, multi-method framework

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 1323-1327

  Westbrook, Johanna I ^a   Braithwaite, Jeffrey ^a   Iedema, Rick ^a   Coiera, Enrico W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

evaluation model; health informatics; information and communication technologies; socio technical

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; EVALUATION MODELS; HEALTH INFORMATICS; INFORMATICS RESEARCH; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; MULTI METHODS; ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEM; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SOCIOTECHNICAL;

MEDICAL INFORMATICS;

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMATION SCIENCE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; SOCIOLOGY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; EVALUATION STUDIES; HEALTH FACILITIES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; SOCIOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 21644462401     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Landauer T. The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability, and productivity. Massachusettes: MIT, 1995.
2. Aarts J, Peel V. Using a descriptive model of change when implying large scale clinical information systems to identify priorities for further research. Int J Med Inform 1999; 56:43-50.
3. Lehoux P, et al. Assessment of a Computerized MR System: Disclosing Scripts of Use. Eval Plan 1999; 22:439-453.
4. Heath C, Luff P. Convergent Activities: Line Control and Passenger Information on the London Underground. In: Engestrom Y, Middleton D, eds. Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: CUP, 1998.
5. Goodwin C, Goodwin M. Seeing as Situated Activity: Formulating Planes. In: Engestrom Y, Middleton D, eds. Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: CUP, 1998:96-129.
6. Helmreich R, Merritt A. Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational and Professional Influences. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.
7. Kauffman S. The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: OUP, 1993.
8. Kaplan B, Shaw N. People, organizational and social issues: Evaluation as an exemplar. In: Haux R, Kulikowski C, eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2002. Stuttgart: Schattauer, 2002:91-99.
9. Kaplan B, Duchon D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1988; 12:571-586.
10. Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997;4:94-101.
11. Martin J. Organisational culture: mapping the terrain. California: Sage, 2002.
12. Hofstede G. Identifying organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organ Stud 1998; 19:1.
13. Gosling AS, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. (2003) Clinical team functioning and IT innovation: A study of the diffusion of a point-of-care online evidence system. JAMIA 10, 246-253.
14. Engestrom Y. Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective. JCollab Comput 1999;8:63-93.
15. Star S. Working together: symbolic interactionism, action theory and information systems. In: Engestrom Y, Middleton D, eds. Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998:296-340.
16. Degeling P, et al. The Organization of Hospital Care and its Effects. Sydney: University of New South Wales, 2000.
17. Degeling P, et al. Professional sub-cultures and hospital reform. Sydney: University of NSW, 1998:321.
18. Massaro T. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on Organizational culture and behaviour. Acad Med 1989; 64:20-25.
19. Santahanam R, et al. An empirical investigation of ODSS impact on individuals and organizations. Dec Supp Sys 2000; 30:51-72.
20. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64:39-55.
21. Rogers E. Diffusion Of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 1995.
22. Kast F, Rosenzweig J. Contingency views of organization and management. Chicago: SRA, 1973.
23. Pfeffer J. Power in organizations. Marshfield: Pitman, 1981.
24. Klein K, Kozlowski S. Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
25. Iedema R, Forsyth R, Delaney G, Jacob S, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J, Barton M.Video ethnography as a methodology for studying the technologization of practice. Submitted to Medlnfo 2004.
26. Westbrook JI and Gosling AS (2002) The Impact of Point of Care Clinical Systems on Health Care: A Review of the Evidence and A Framework for Evaluation. Kensington: Centre for Health Informatics, University of NSW.
27. Lindberg D, et al. Use of MEDLINE by physicians for clinical problem solving. J Am Med Ass 1993; 269:3124-3129.
28. Kibel B. Success stories as hard data: An introduction to Results Mapping. In: Gullotta T, ed. Prevention in Practice Library. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999.
29. Anderson N, West M. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Org Beh 1998; 19:235-258.
30. Annett J. Theoretical and pragmatic influences on task analysis methods. In: Chipman S, Shalin V, eds. Cognitive task analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, 2000:25-41.
31. Shu K, et al. Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry, Medinfo, London, 2001. IOS Press.
32. Birdwhistell R. Kinesics and context: essays on body-motion communication. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.
33. Wyly B. From access points to materials: A transaction log analysis of access point value for online catalogue users. Lib Res Tech Serv 1996; 40:211-236.
34. Westbrook J, Gosling S. Patterns of utilisation of the Clinical Information Access Program (CLAP) by clinicians in NSW: An analysis of web server logs, Ninth National Health Informatics Conference, Canberra, 2001. Health Informatics Society of Australia (HIS A).