|
|
|
Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 458-475
|
|
Conjoined twins: the conflict between parents and the courts over the medical treatment of children.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANENCEPHALUS;
ARTICLE;
CONFLICT;
CONJOINED TWINS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT 1986;
HUMAN;
IN RE BABY K;
INFANT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
JUVENILE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LONG TERM CARE;
PARENT;
PATIENT ABANDONMENT;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RE A (CHILDREN) (CONJOINED TWINS: SURGICAL SEPARATION);
RELIGION;
SURGERY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOR ACT 1986;
IN RE BABY K;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RE A (CHILDREN) (CONJOINED TWINS: SURGICAL SEPARATION);
ANENCEPHALY;
DECISION MAKING;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
MINORS;
PARENTS;
REFUSAL TO TREAT;
RELIGION;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TWINS, CONJOINED;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 21644453654
PISSN: 01962035
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
