Electrical Impedance Tomography using a 3-D Boundary Element inverse solution

Conference Record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages 1595-1599

  Babaeizadeh, Saeed ^a   Brooks, Dana H ^a   Isaacson, David ^b  

^a Northeastern University   (United States)

^b Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ITERATIVE ALGORITHMS; JACOBIAN MATRIX; NEWTON METHOD; PRECONDITIONED CONJUGATE GRADIENTS (PCG);

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 21644453575     PISSN: 10586393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. R. N. Klepfer, C. R. Johnson, and R. S. Macleod, "The effects of inhomogeneities and anisotropies on electrocardiographic fields: a three-dimensional finite element study," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 44, August 1997.
2. L. K. Cheng, J. M. Bodley, and A. J. Pullan, "Effects of experimental and modeling errors on electrocardiographic inverse formulations," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 23-32, January 2003.
3. P. C. Stanley, T. C. Pilkington, and M. N. Morrow, "The effects of thoracic inhomogeneities on the relationship between epicardial and torso potentials," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 273-284, 1986.
4. M. Cheney, D. Isaacson, and J. C. Newell, "Electrical impedance tomography," SIAM Review, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 85-101, 1999.
5. R. Duraiswami, G. L. Chahine, and K. Sarkar, "Boundary element techniques for efficient 2-D and 3-D electrical impedance tomography," Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 52, no. 13, July 1997.
6. R. Duraiswami, K. Sarkar, and G. L. Chahine, "Efficient 2D and 3D electrical impedance tomography using dual reciprocity boundary element techniques," Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13-31, 1998.
7. J. C. De Munck, T. J. C. Faes, and R. M. Heethaar, "The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 792-800, June 2000.
8. M. Hanke and M. Bruhl, "Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography," Inverse Prolems, vol. 19, pp. S65-S90, 2003.
9. S. Babaeizadeh, D. H. Brooks, and D. Isaacson, "A 3-D boundary element solution to the forward problem of electrical impedance tomography," in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA, USA, September 2004, pp. 960-963.
10. T. F. Coleman and Y. Li, "On the convergence of reflective newton methods for large-scale nonlinear minimization subject to bounds," Mathematical Programming, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 189-224, 1994.
11. _, "An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds," SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 6, pp. 418-445, 1996.
12. A. L. Piccolomini and F. Zama, "The conjugate gradient regularization method in computed tomography problems," Appl. Math. and Comp., vol. 102, pp. 87-99, 1999.
13. J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, "A simplex method for function minimization," Comput. J., vol. 7, pp. 308-313, 1965.
14. S. Boyd, C. Crusius, and A. Hansson, "Control applications of nonlinear convex programming," Journal of Process Control, vol. 8, pp. 313-324, 1998.
15. "http://software.sci.utah.edu/."
16. "http://software.sci.utah.edu/scirun-datasets.html."
17. D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson, and J. C. Newell, "Electric current computed tomography and eigenvalues," SIAM J. APPL MATH., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1623-1634, December 1990.
18. P. Hunter and A. Pullan, "Fem/bem notes," Department of Engineering Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand, 2002.
19. D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson, and J. C. Newell, "Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system," Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurements, vol. 9, pp. 35-41, 1988.
20. E. Somersalo, M. Cheney, and D. Isaacson, "Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography," Inverse Problems, vol. 52, no. 4, 1992.