The Channel Islands marine reserve process: The role of the social sciences

California and the World Ocean - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 948-961

  Pomeroy, Caroline ^a   Hunter, Monica S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; FISHERIES; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (MPA); MARINE RESERVE PROCESS; OCEAN MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL SCIENTIFIC DATA;

MARINE APPLICATIONS;

EID: 21644452540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Alcala, A. C., and G. R. Russ. 1990. A direct test of the effects of protective management on abundance and yield of tropical marine resources. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 46:40-47.
2. Bennett, B.A., and C. G. Attwood. 1991. Evidence for recovery of a surf-zone fish assemblage following the establishment of a marine reserve on the southern coast of South Africa. Marine Ecology Progress Series 75(2,3): 173-181.
3. California Code of Regulations (CCR). Title 14. Chapter 3. Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act.
4. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2002. www.dfg.ca.gov/mrd/mlpa/working_group.html. accessed April 2002.
5. Dayton, P.K. 1998. Reversal of the burden of proof in fisheries management. Science 279(5352): 821.
6. Dugan, J.E. and G.E. Davis. 1993. Applications of marine refugia to coastal fisheries management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:2029-2042.
7. Farrow, S. 1996. Marine protected areas emerging economics. Marine Policy (20)6:439-46.
8. Hunter, M. 1995. Who owns the fish?: Emerging perceptions of commercial fishers and resource managers at San Pedro Bay, California. Master's Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
9. Mailhot, J. 1993. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: The Diversity of Knowledge Systems and Their Study. Montreal: Great Whale Public Review Support Office.
10. National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Marine protected areas: Tools for sustaining ocean ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
11. Netting, R.M. 1986. Cultural Ecology. 2nd Ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
12. Pomeroy, C., and M. FitzSimmons. 1998. Information needs for effective management of the California market squid fishery: The role of social science research. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Reports 39:108-114.
13. Pomeroy, C., and M. FitzSimmons. 2001. Socioeconomic organization of the California market squid fishery: Assessment for optimal resource management. California Sea Grant Project Report.
14. Pomeroy, C., and M. Hunter. 2001. The Channel Islands squid fishery. Summary prepared for the March 21, 2001 Channel Islands Marine reserves Working Group Meeting.
15. Pomeroy, C., M. Hunter and M. Los Huertos. 2002. Socioeconomic profile of the California wetfish industry, in D.B. Pleschner, ed., California's "Wetfish" Industry: Its Importance Past, Present and Future. Santa Barbara, CA: California Seafood Council. (www.ca-seafood.org/news/wetfish)
16. Roberts, C.M. 1997. Ecological advice for the global fisheries crisis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 35-38.