Emergent networks, locus of control, and the pursuit of social capital

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 592-595

  Stefanone, Michael ^a   Hancock, Jeffery ^a   Gay, Geri ^a   Ingraffea, Anthony ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Instrumental Action; Locus of Control; Social Networks

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DISTANCE EDUCATION; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

INSTRUMENTAL ACTION; LOCUS OF CONTROL; SOCIAL CAPITAL; SOCIAL NETWORKS;

NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

EID: 21644437268     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1031607.1031708     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Blechman, E. A. and Dannemiller, E. A. Effects on performance of perceived control over noxious noise. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 601-607, 1976.
2. Bradner, E. and Mark, G. Why distance matters: Effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. Proceedings of the 2002 CSCW Conference, p. 226-235, 2002.
3. Borgatti, S. P., Everatt, M. G. and Freeman, L. C. Ucinel for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
4. Burt, R. S. Structural Holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
5. Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99: 1411-1454, 1994.
6. Glass, D. C. and Singer, J. E. Urban Stress. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
7. Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1379, 1973.
8. Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Social Structure and Network Analysis (pp. 105-130), Sage: Beverly Hills, 1982.
9. Haythornthwaite, C. Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17(3), p.211-226, 2001.
10. Laumann, E. O. Prestige and association in an urban community, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.
11. Lefcourt, H. M. Locus of Control: Current trends in theory and research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982.
12. Lin, N. Building a network theory of social capital. In Social capital: Theory and research, p. 3-30, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2001.
13. Lin, N. Social resources and instrumental action. In Social Structure and Network Analysis, p. 131-145, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982.
14. Mitchell, J. C. The concept and use of social networks. In Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. 1-50, 1969.
15. Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1966.
16. Seeman, M. Alienation and social learning in a reformatory. American Journal of Sociology, 69, 270-284, 1963.
17. Shen, C., Lesh, N. B., Vernier, F., Forlines, C. and Frost, J. Sharing and building digital group histories. Proceedings of 2002 CSCW Conference, p. 324-333, 2002.
18. Sherrod, D. R. and Cohen, S. Density, perceived control, and design. In Residential Crowding and Design, New York: Plenum, 1978.
19. Wellman, B. An egocentric network take. Social Networks, 15, 423-436, 1993.