Prioritizing long-term watershed management strategies using group decision analysis

International Journal of Water Resources Development

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 297-309

  Ghanbarpour, M Reza ^a   Hipel, Keith W ^b   Abbaspour, Karim C ^c  

^a University of Mazandaran Faculty of Natural Resources   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; STRATEGIC PLANNING; WATER RESOURCES;

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; PREFERENCE ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDERS; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

WATERSHEDS;

WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE; WATERSHED;

WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE; WATERSHED;

EID: 21544454936     PISSN: 07900627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07900620500108528     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brooks, K. N., Efolliott, P. F., Gregersen, H. M. & DeBano, L. F. (1997) Hydrology and the Management of Watersheds (Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press).
2. Fishburn, P. C. (1974) Social choice functions, SIAM Review, 16, pp. 63-90.
3. Heathcote, I. W. (1998) Integrated Watershed Management (New York: Wiley).
4. Hwang, C. (1987) Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria (Berlin: Springer).
5. Jahad Water and Watershed Research Company (2000) Integrated Watershed Surveys for the Kan Watershed. Technical Report (Tehran: JWWRC).
6. Jønch-Clausen, T. & Fugl, J. (2001) Firming up the conceptual basis of integrated water resources management, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 17, pp. 501-510.
7. Kangas, J. (1999) The analytic hierarchy process (AHP): standard version, forestry application and advances, in: F. Helles, P. Holten-Andersen & L. Wichmann (Eds) Multiple Uses of Forests and Other Natural Resources, pp. 96-105 (Amsterdam: Kluwer).
8. Marttunen, M. & Hamalainen, R. P. (1995) Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment, European Journal of Operational Research, 87, pp. 551-563.
9. Peterson, D. L. & Schmoldt, D. L. (1999) Using the analytical tools for decision-making and program planning in natural resources: breaking the fear barrier, in: D. Harmon (Ed.) On the Frontiers of Conservation, Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Research and Resource Management in Parks and on Public Lands, pp. 256-262 (Hancock MI: George Wright Society).
10. Pykalainen, J., Kangas, J. & Loikkanen, T. (1999) Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences from state-owned boreal forests, Journal of Forest Economics, 5, pp. 341-364.
11. Rauscher, H. M., Lloyd, F. T., Loftis, D. L. & Twery, M. J. (2000) A practical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management, Journal of Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 27, pp. 195-226.
12. Saaty, T. L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process (New York: McGraw-Hill).
13. Saaty, T. L. (1990) Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publ.).
14. Schmoldt, D. L., Peterson, D. L. & Smith, R. L. (1995) The analytic hierarchy process and participatory decision-making, in: J. M. Power, M. Strome & T. C. Daniel (Eds) Proceedings of the 4th international Symposium on Advanced Technology in Natural Resources Management, pp. 129-143 (Bethesda, MD: American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing).
15. Stakhiv, E. Z. & Major, D. C. (1997) Ecosystem evaluation, climate change and water resources planning, Climatic Change, 37, pp. 103-120.