Interfacial interaction of carbon fiber/PEEK and its effect on the mechanical performance

Progress in Natural Science

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 247-249

  Li, Tieqi ^a,b   Zhang, Mingqiu ^a   Zeng, Hanmin ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUANGDONG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Interface; Interfacial interaction; Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites; Shear and fracture properties

Indexed keywords

ELASTOMERS; FRACTURE; REINFORCED PLASTICS;

ANISOTROPIC PROPERTY; ANISOTROPIC STRUCTURE; CARBON FIBER REINFORCED; DEPTH SURVEYS; FRACTURE PROPERTY; INTERFACIAL INTERACTION; MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE; POLYETHERETHERKETONE COMPOSITES; SHEAR PROPERTIES; STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES;

SHEAR FLOW;

EID: 21444460614     PISSN: 10020071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Cox, H. L. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Brit. J. Appl. Phys., 1952, 3: 72.
2. McGarry, F. J. et al. Resin-fiber load transfer in reinforced plastics. Mod. Plast., 1968, (7): 143.
3. Erickson, P. W. et al. Historical background of interface studies and theories. In: Interfaces in Polymer Matrix Composites (ed. Plueddemann, E. P.). New York: Academic Press, 1974, 2.
4. Papenicolaou, G. C. et al. The concept of boundary interphase in composite mechanics. Coll. Polym. Sci., 1978, 256: 625.
5. Theocris, P. S. et al. The adhesion coefficient of fiber-reinforced polymers evaluated by dynamic measurements. Coll. Polym. Sci., 1982, 260: 837.
6. Kim, J. K. et al. Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998, 5.
7. Robinson, I. M. et al. Strain dependence of the Raman frequencies for different types of carbon fibers. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1987, 6: 1212.
8. Young, R. J. et al. Fiber deformation and residual thermal stresses in carbon fiber reinforced PEEK. Compos. Sci. Technol., 1989, 34: 243.
9. Galiotis, C. A study of mechanisms of stress transfer in continuous and discontinuous fiber model composites by laser Raman spectroscopy. Compos. Sci. Technol., 1993, 48: 15.
10. Sellitti, C. et al. Surface characterization of carbon fibers and interphase phenomena in epoxy-reinforced composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1990, A126: 235.
11. Drzal, L. T. Composite interphase characterization. SAMPE J., 1983, 19 (Sept/Oct): 7.
12. Ishida, H. et al. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of the silane coupling agent/porous silica interface. J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 1978, 64: 555.
13. Hoh, K.-P. et al. Multi-nuclear NMR spectroscopy and proton NMR imaging studies on the effect of water on the silane coupling agent/matrix resin interface in glass-fiber-reinforced composites. Polym. Compos., 1990, 11: 192.
14. Stone, P. R. et al. Interfacial toughness and its effects on compression strength in polycarbonate/carbon fiber composites. Polym. Compos., 1994, 15: 197.
15. Asloun, E. M. et al. Stress transfer in single -fiber composites: effects of adhesion, elastic modulus of fiber and matrix, and polymer chain mobility. J. Mater. Sci., 1989, 24: 1835.
16. Pisanova, E. V. et al. Interfacial adhesion and failure modes in single filament thermoplastic composite. Polym. Compos., 1994, 15: 147.
17. Vu-Khanh, T. et al. Effect of molding parameters on the interfacial strength in PEEK/carbon composites. J. Reinforced Plast. Compos., 1993, 12: 916.
18. Zhang, M. et al. Effect of transcrystallinity on tensile behaviour of discontinuous carbon fiber reinforced semicrystalline thermoplastic composites. Polymer, 1996, 37: 5151.
19. Manson, J.-A. E. et al. Process simulated laminate (PSL): a methodology to internal stress characterization in advanced composite materials. J. Compos. Mater., 1992, 26: 405.
20. Zeng, H. et al. Investigation on the crystalline morphologies of polyphenylene sulfide and interfacial effects in fiber composites. Angew. Makromol. Chem., 1984, 127: 103.
21. Zhang, Z. et al. Nucleation and crystal growth of PEEK on carbon fiber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1993, 48: 1987.
22. Zeng, H. et al. Transcrystalline structure of PEEK. Eur. Polym. J., 1994, 30: 354.
23. Zeng, H. et al. Young's modulus of transcrystallinity in semicrystalline thermoplastic composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1994, 54: 541.
24. Zhang, M. et al. Fracture characteristics of discontinuous carbon fiber-reinforced PPS and PES-C composites. Polym. Polym. Compos., 1993, 1: 357.
25. Lin, G. et al. Fractal characterization of fractured surfaces in a resin based composite. Acta Mater. Compos. Sinica (in Chinese), 1993, 10(2): 13.
26. Qiu, W. et al. Effect of macromolecular coupling agent on the properties of GF/PP composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1999, 71: 1537.
27. Kemmish, J. et al. Polyaryletherketone matrix resins and composites. In: Encyclopedia of Composite Materials (ed. Lee, S. M.), Vol.6. New York: VCH, 1991, 258.
28. Li, T. Q. et al. A study of interfacial structure in carbon fiber/polyetheretherketone composites with FT-Raman spectroscopy. Acta Polym. Sinica (in Chinese), 1998, (4): 482.
29. Tuinstra, F. et al. Raman spectrum of graphite. J. Chem. Phys., 1970, 53: 1126.
30. Li, T. Q. et al. Strong interaction at interface of carbon fiber reinforced aromatic semicrystalline thermoplastics. Polymer., 1999, 40: 4307.
31. Cole, K. C. et al. Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopic study of thermal degradation in poly(ether ether ketone)-carbon composites. Polymer., 1993, 34: 740.
32. Xue, G. Spectrascopy Methods in Studies of Polymer Structure (in Chinese), Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1995, 160.
33. Scott, J. R. Soft-mode spectroscopy: experimental studies of structural phase transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1974, 46: 83.
34. Dresselhaus, M. S. et al. Light Scattering in Solids III. Recent Results. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1982, 35.
35. Krekel, G. et al. The relevance of the surface structure and chemistry of carbon fibres in their adhesion to high-temperature thermoplastics. Par I Surface structure and morphology. J. Mater. Sci., 1994, 29: 2968.
36. Li, T. Q. et al. Structure aspects of interfacial stress transfer in a fiber/thermoplastic composite. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2000, 19: 837.
37. Chapman, T. J. et al. Prediction of process-induced residual stresses in thermoplastic composites. J. Compos. Mater., 1990, 24: 616.
38. Jain, M. K. et al. Conversion of acrylonitril-based precursor fibres to carbon fibers, Part 1. J. Mater. Sci., 1987, 22: 278.
39. Li, T. Q. et al. A preliminary proof of the quasi-epitaxial growth of a semicrystalline polymer in its short carbon fiber composites. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1999, 18: 1861.
40. 40: Lovinger, A. L. et al. High-temperature crystallization and morphology of poly(arylether ether ketone. Macromolecules, 1992, 25: 1752.
41. Lustiger, A. Morphological aspects of the interface in the PEEK-carbon fiber system. Polym. Compos., 1992, 13: 408.
42. de Gennes, P.-G. Scaling Concept in Ploymer Physics. Ithaca: Cornell University, 1979, 219.
43. Li, T. Q. et al. Long-range effects of carbon fiber on crystallization of semicrystalline thermoplastics. Polymer., 2000, 41: 161.
44. Xiao, X. R. et al. Effect of low melt temperature on morphology and Mode-I Fracture toughness of PEEK/carbon composite. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater., 1992, 5: 64.
45. Tregun, A. et al. Thermal treatment effects on the crystallinity and the mechanical behaviour of carbon fiber-PEEK composites. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1994, 13: 329.
46. Talbot, M. et al. The effects of crystallinity on the mechanical properties of PEEK polymer and graphite fiber reinforced PEEK. J. Compos. Mater., 1987, 21: 1056.
47. Chen, M. et al. Crystallinity of isothermally and nonisothermally crystallized poly(ether ether ketone) composites. Polym. Compos., 1998, 19: 689.
48. Blundell, D. J. et al. Spherullitic morphology of the matrix of thermoplastic PEEK/carbon fiber aromatic polymer composites. J. Mater. Sci., 1989, 24: 2057.
49. Sarasua, J. R. et al. Recycling effects on microstructure and mechanical behaviour of PEEK short carbon-fibre composites. J. Mater. Sci., 1997, 32: 533.
50. Li, T. Q. et al. The dependence of the fracture toughness of thermoplastic composite laminates on interfacial interaction. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2000, 60: 465.