Towards a more cosmopolitan political science?

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 31, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 17-34

  Morris, Pippa ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21444458494     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1997.tb00761.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Almond, G. A. (1990). A discipline divided: Schools and sects in political science. London: Sage.
2. Almond, G.A. & Bingham Powell Jr, G. (1966). Comparative politics: A developmental approach. Boston: Little, Brown.
3. Almond, G.A. & Bingham Powell Jr, G. (1992). Comparative politics today. New York: Harper-Collins.
4. APSA, Committee on Political Parties (1950). Towards a more responsible two-party system, American Political Science Revie\v. September 1950, supplement.
5. Bingham Powell, G. (1995). Report of the managing editor of the American Political Science Review, 1994-95, PS: Political Science and Politics 28(4): 764-768.
6. Brintnall, M. (1996). Job prospects for political scientists: Placement experience in 1995, PS: Political Science and Politics 29(2): 211-215.
7. Brunn, S. & Leinbach, T.R. eds. (1991). Collapsing space and time: Geographic aspects of communication and information. London: Harper-Collins.
8. Campbell, C. (1993). Political executives and their officials. In: A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: APSA.
9. Crewe, I. & Noms, P. (1991). British and American journal evaluation: Divergence or convergence, PS: Political Science and Politics 24(3): 524-531.
10. Dogan, M. & Pelassy, D. (1990). How to compare nations. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
11. EJPR ( 1991 ). Political science in Western Europe, 1960-1990, European Journal of Political Research, special issue, 20(3-^): 225-466.
12. Farr, J., Dryzek, J.S. & Leonard, S.T., eds. (1995). Political science in history. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Featherstone, M., ed. (1995). Global culture. London: Sage.
14. Giles, M.W., Mizell, F. & Patterson, D. (1989). Political scientists'journal evaluations revisited, PS: Political Science and Politics 22: 613-617.
15. ISSJ (1973). Autobiographical portraits, International Social Science Journal 25 (1/2).
16. Janda, K. (1993). Comparative political parties: Research and theory. In A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline, Vol. 2, Washington, DC: APS A.
17. LaPonce, J.A. (1980). An import-export analysis of journals and footnotes, Political Studies 28: 401-419.
18. Leduc, L., Niemi, R. & Noms, P. (1996). Comparing democracies: Voting and elections in comparative perspective. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in t\venty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Lijphart, A., ed. (1992). Parliamentary versus presidential government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. McKay, D. (1988). Why is there a European political science?, PS: Political Science and Politics 21: 1051-1056.
22. McKay, D. ( 1991 ). Is European political science inferior to or different from American political science?, European Journal of Political Research 20: 459-466.
23. Mezey, M. (1993). Legislatures: Individual purpose and institutional performance. In A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science: The state of the discipline, Vol. 2, Washington, DC: APS A.
24. Miller, A., Tien, C. & Feebler, A.A. (1996). The American Political Science Revi&v Hall of Fame assessments and implications for a evolving discipline, PS: Political Science and Politics 29: 73-83.
25. Mowlana, H. (1985). International flows of information: A global report and analysis. Paris: UNESCO.
26. Newton, K. & Vallès, J.M. (1991). Introduction: Political science in Western Europe, 19601990, European Journal of Political Research 20: 227-238.
27. Newton, K. (1991). The European Consortium for Political Research, European Journal for Political Research 20:445-458.
28. Norris, P. & Crewe, I. (1993). The reputation of political science journals: Pluralist and consensus views, Political Studies 41(1): 5-23.
29. Norris, P. (1994). Political science in Britain and America: The decline of the special relationship?, PSA Ne\vs 6: 15-17.
30. Norris, P. (1990). Survey of political studies, PSA Ne\vs 2(2): 29-31.
31. Ricci, D.M. (1994). The tragedy of political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Rogowski, R. (1993). Comparative politics. In A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: APSA.
33. Rose, R. (1990). Institutionalising professional political science in Europe: A dynamic model, European Journal of Political Research 18: 581-603.
34. Rose, R. (1991). Comparing forms of comparative analysis, Political Studies 34(3): 446-462.
35. Seidelman, R. (1985). Disenchanted realists: Political science and the American crisis, 1884-1984. New York: State University of New York Press.
36. Swanson, D. & Mancini, P. (1996). Politics, media and modern democracy. New York: Praeger.
37. Trent, J. (1979). Political science beyond political boundaries: The international institutional development. In Stein Rokkan (éd.), A quarter century of international political science, (pp. 180-199). New Delhi: Concept Publishing.
38. Wilson, F.L. (1995). Teaching comparative politics in the 1990s, PS: Political Science and Politics 28(1): 79-80.