EEG derivations providing auditory steady-state responses with high signal-to-noise ratios in infants

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 299-309

  Van Der Reijden, Christoph S ^a   Mens, Lucas H M ^a   Snik, Ad F M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; MALE; MASTOID; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NORMAL HUMAN; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEADY STATE; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ARTIFACTS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NOISE; REACTION TIME; TAPE RECORDING;

EID: 21444437237     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aoyagi, M., Kiren, T., Furuse, H., Fuse, T., Suzuki, Y., Yokota, M., et al. (1994). Effects of aging on amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngology (Stockh), Suppl, 511, 15-22.
2. Aoyagi, M., Kiren, T., Kim, Y., Suzuki, Y., Fuse, T., & Koike, Y. (1993). Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hearing Research, 65, 253-261.
3. Aoyagi, M., Suzuki, Y., Yokota, M., Furuse, H., Watanabe, T., & Ito, T. (1999). Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 4, 28-37.
4. Aoyagi, M., Yamazaki, Y., Yokota, M., Fuse, T., Suzuki, Y., Itoh, S., et al. (1996). Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngology (Stockh), Suppl, 522, 6-10.
5. Cebulla, M., Stürzebecher, E., & Pschirrer, U. (2000). Registrierung der AMFR - Einfluss von Elektrodenposition und Modulationsfrequenz. Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 39, 78-85.
6. Cohen, L. T., Rickards, F. W., & Clark, G. M. (1991). A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2467-2479.
7. Cone-Wesson, B., Rickards, F., Poulis, C., Parker, J., Tan, L., & Pollard, J. (2002). The auditory steady-state response: Clinical observations and applications in infants and children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 270-282.
8. Conijn, E. A. J. G., Brocaar, M. P., Van Zanten, G. A., & Van der Drift, J. F. C. (1992). Comparison between the frequency specificities of auditory brainstem response thresholds to clicks with and without high-pass masking noise. Audiology, 31, 284-292.
9. Cuffin, B. N. (1993). Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEGs and MEG's. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 40, 42-48.
10. Dobie, R. A., & Wilson, M. J. (1996). A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2236-2246.
11. Dobie, R. A., & Wilson, M. J. (1998). Low-level steady-state auditory evoked potentials: Effects of rate and sedation on detectability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 3482-3488.
12. Feigin, J. A., Kopun, J. G., Stelmachowicz, P. G., & Gorga, M. P. (1989). Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. Ear and Hearing, 10, 254-258.
13. Gorga, M. P., Worthington, D. W., Reiland, J. K., Beauchaine, K. A., & Goldgar, D. E. (1985). Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram. Ear and Hearing, 6, 105-112.
14. Herdman, A. T., & Stapells, D. R. (2001). Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal- hearing subjects. Scandinavian Audiology, 30, 41-49.
15. Herdman, A. T., Lins, O., Van Roon, P., Stapells, D. R., Scherg, M., & Picton, T. W. (2002). Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topography, 15, 69-86.
16. John, M. S., & Picton, T. W. (2000). MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 61, 125-150.
17. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2001a). Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 555-562.
18. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Picton, T. W. (2002). Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear and Hearing, 23, 106-117.
19. John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., Van Roon, P., & Picton, T. W. (2001b). Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 6, 12-27.
20. John, M. S., Lins, O. G., Boucher, B. L., & Picton, T. W. (1998). Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 59-82.
21. Langman J. (2003). The skeleton. In: Sadler TW (Ed): Langman's Medical Embryology, 9th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers.
22. Levi, E. C., Folsom, R. C., & Dobie, R. A. (1993). Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age and state. Hearing Research, 68, 42-52.
23. Levi, E. C., Folsom, R. C., & Dobie, R. A. (1995). Coherence analysis of envelope-following responses (EFRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in infants and adults. Hearing Research, 89, 21-27.
24. Lins, O. G., & Picton, T. W. (1995). Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 420-432.
25. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Boucher, B. L., Durieux-Smith, A., Champagne, S. C., Moran, L. M., Perez-Abalo, M. C., Martin, V., & Savio, G. (1996). Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear and Hearing, 1796, 81-96.
26. nd International Symposium and Workshop on Objective Measures in Cochlear Implantation. Lyon, 16-18 March, pp 67.
27. Moore, K. L. (1973). The developing human. In: Clinically oriented embryology. WB Saunders, pp 289.
28. Perez-Abalo, M. C., Savio, G., Torres, A., Martín, V., Rodríguez, E., & Galán, L. (2001). Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear and Hearing, 22, 200-211.
29. Picton, T. W., John, M. S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Purcell, D. (2003). Human auditory steady-state responses. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 177-219.
30. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. (1994). Confidence limits by Monte Carlo simulation. In: Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT: Numerical Recipes in Pascal. Cambridge University Press, pp 582-584.
31. Rance, G., Beer, D. E., Cone-Wesson, B., Shepherd, R. K., Dowell, R. C., King, A. M., et al. (1999). Clinical findings for a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. Ear and Hearing, 20, 238-252.
32. Rance, G., Rickards, F. W., Cohen, L. T., De Vidi, S., & Clark, G. M. (1995). The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear and Hearing, 16, 499-507.
33. Rees, A., Green, G. G. R., & Kay, R. H. (1986). Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hearing Research, 23, 123-133.
34. nd edition, Duxbury Press, pp 72-73.
35. Rickards, F. W., Tan, L. E., Cohen, L. T., Wilson, O. J., Drew, J. H., & Clark, G. M. (1994). Auditory steady state evoked potential in newborns. British Journal of Audiology, 28, 327-337.
36. Savio, G., Cárdenas, J., Pérez Abalo, M., Gonzáles, A., & Valdés, J. (2001). The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 6, 279-287.
37. Stapells, D. R., Galambos, R., Costello, J. A., & Makeig, S. (1988). Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 71, 420-432.
38. Stürzebecher, E., Cebulla, M., & Pschirrer, U. (2001). Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response. Audiology, 40, 63-68.
39. Valdez, J. L., Perez-Abalo, M. C., Martin, V., Savio, G., Sierra, C., Rodriguez, E., & Lins, O. (1997). Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear and Hearing, 18, 420-429.
40. van der Drift, J. F. C., Brocaar, M. P., & Van Zanten, G. A. (1987). The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. Audiology, 26, 1-10.
41. Van der Reijden, C. S., Mens, L. H. M., & Snik, A. F. M. (2003). Comparing signal to noise ratios of amplitude modulation following responses from fifty-five EEG derivations in awake normally hearing adults. In: Proceedings of the XVIII IERASG Biennial Symposium, pp 101.
42. Van der Reijden, C. S., Mens, L. H. M., & Snik, A. F. M. (2004). Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15, 692-701.