Central and peripheral visual interactions in disparity-induced vergence eye movements: I. Spatial interaction

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1132-1138

  Tanimoto, Naoyuki ^a   Takagi, Mineo ^a   Bando, Takehiko ^a,b   Abe, Haruki ^a   Hasegawa, Shigeru ^a   Usui, Tomoaki ^a   Miki, Atsushi ^a   Zee, David S ^c  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; DYNAMICS; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INFRARED RADIATION; LIQUID CRYSTAL; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PERIPHERAL VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 2142827891     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0669     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Rashbass C, Westheimer G. Disjunctive eye movements. J Physiol. 1961;159:339-360.
2. Kertesz AE. Effect of stimulus size on fusion and vergence. J Opt Soc Am. 1981;71:289-293.
3. Boman DK, Kertesz AE. Effect of stimulus parameters on fusional and stereoscopic performance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985;62:222-227.
4. Howard IP, Fang X, Allison RS, Zacher JE. Effects of stimulus size and eccentricity on horizontal and vertical vergence. Exp Brain Res. 2000;130:124-132.
5. Burian HM. Fusional movements: the role of peripheral retinal stimuli. Arch Ophthalmol. 1939;21:486-491.
6. Winkelman JE. Central and peripheral fusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1953;50:179-183.
7. Hampton DR, Kertesz AE. Fusional vergence response to local peripheral stimulation. J Opt Soc Am. 1983;73:7-10.
8. Hung GK, Semmlow JL, Sun L, Ciuffreda KJ. Vergence control of central and peripheral disparities. Exp Neurol. 1991;113:202-211.
9. Masson GS, Busettini C, Yang D-S, Miles FA. Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity. Vision Res. 2001;41:3371-3387.
10. Boman DK, Kertesz AE. Fusional responses of strabismics to foveal and extrafoveal stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:1731-1739.
11. Campos EC, Bolzani R, Gualdi G, Cipolli C. Recording of disparity vergence in comitant esotropia. Doc Ophthalmol. 1989;71:69-76.
12. Lyle TK, Foley J. Subnormal binocular vision with special reference to peripheral fusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 1955;39:474-487.
13. Jones R. Anomalies of disparity detection in the human visual system. J Physiol. 1977;264:621-640.
14. Bahill AT, Clark MR, Stark L. The main sequence: a tool for studying human eye movements. Math Biosci. 1975;24:191-203.
15. Jones R. Fusional vergence: sustained and transient components. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57:640-644.
16. Schor CM, Ciuffreda KJ. Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects. Boston: Butterworths; 1983.
17. Hung GK. Models of Oculomotor Control. Singapore: World Scientific; 2001.
18. Hung GK, Semmlow JL, Ciuffreda J. A dual-mode dynamic model of the vergence eye movement system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1986;33:1021-1028.
19. Semmlow JL, Hung GK, Homg JL, Ciuffreda K. Initial control component in disparity vergence eye movements. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993;13:48-55.
20. Jones R, Stephens GL. Horizontal fusional amplitudes: evidence for disparity tuning. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:1638-1642.
21. Edwards M, Pope DR, Schor CM. Luminance contrast and spatial-frequency tuning of the transient-vergence system. Vision Res. 1998;38:705-717.
22. Sato M, Edwards M, Schor CM. Envelope size-tuning for transient disparity vergence. Vision Res. 2001;41:1695-1707.
23. Semmlow JL, Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. Quantitative assessment of disparity vergence components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:558-564.
24. Keller EL, Khan NS. Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey. Vision Res. 1986;26:943-955.
25. Niemann T, Hoffmann KP. The influence of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on smooth-pursuit initiation and steady-state pursuit in humans. Exp Brain Res. 1997;115:531-540.
26. Busettini C, Fitzgibbon EJ, Miles FA. Short-latency disparity vergence in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85:1129-1152.
27. Busettini C, Masson GS, Miles FA. Radial optic flow induces vergence eye movements with ultra-short latencies. Nature. 1997;390:512-515.
28. Regan D, Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H. Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:584-597.
29. Masson GS, Busettini C, Miles FA. Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature. 1997;389:283-286.
30. Erkelens CJ. Organization of signals involved in binocular perception and vergence control. Vision Res. 2001;41:3497-3503.
31. Mays LE. Neural control of vergence eye movements: convergence and divergence neurons in midbrain. J Neurophysiol. 1984;51:1091-1108.
32. Gamlin PD, Yoon K, Zhang H. The role of the cerebro-pontocerebellar pathways in the control of vergence eye movements. Eye. 1996;10:167-171.
33. Takagi M, Tamargo R, Zee DS. Effects of lesions of the cerebellar oculomotor vermis on eye movements in primate: binocular control. Prog Brain Res. 2003;142:19-33.
34. Baizer JS, Ungerleider LG, Desimone R. Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques. J Neurosci. 1991;11:168-190.
35. Stephen JM, Aine CJ, Christner RF, et al. Central versus peripheral visual field stimulation results in timing differences in dorsal stream sources as measured with MEG. Vision Res. 2002;42:3059-3074.
36. ffytche DH, Guy CN, Zeki S. The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain. 1995;118:1375-1394.
37. Raiguel SE, Lagae L, Gulyas B, Orban GA. Response latencies of visual cells in macaque areas V1, V2 and V5. Brain Res. 1989;493:155-159.
38. Standage GP, Benevento LA. The organization of connections between the pulvinar and visual area MT in the macaque monkey. Brain Res. 1983;262:288-294.
39. Walker R, Deubel H, Schneider WX, Findlay JM. Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78:1108-1119.
40. Ferrera VP, Lisberger SG. The effect of a moving distractor on the initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14:323-338.
41. Ferrera VP, Lisberger SG. Neuronal responses in visual areas MT and MST during smooth pursuit target selection. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78:1433-1446.
42. Ferrera VP, Lisberger SG. Attention and target selection for smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci. 1995;15:7472-7484.