Computer-assisted design and lactonization of model seco-acid derivatives of lankanolide

Tetrahedron

Volumn 60, Issue 21, 2004, Pages 4693-4704

  Hamada, Tatsuo ^a   Kiyokawa, Mitsugu ^a   Kobayashi, Yukinari ^a   Yoshioka, Toshikazu ^a   Sano, Junichiro ^a   Yonemitsu, Osamu ^a,b  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Conformation calculation; Lactonization; Lankanolide; seco Acid

Indexed keywords

3,5 O ISOPROPYLIDENE 9,11 O (2,4,6 TRIMETHYLBENZYLIDENE) 8 HYDROXY 8,8A DEOXA 9 DIHYDROOLEANDONOLIDE; 3,5 O ISOPROPYLIDENE 9,11 O (2,4,6 TRIMETHYLBENZYLIDENE) 8,8A DEOXA 9 DIHYDROOLEANDONOLIDE; 3,5:9,11 BIS O ISOPROPYLIDENE 8,8A DEOXA 9 DIHYDROOLEANDONOLIDE; 3,9:9,11 BIS O (2,4,6 TRIMETHYLBENZYLIDENE) 8,8A DEOXA 9 DIHYDROOLEANDONOLIDE; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; LANKANOLIDE DERIVATIVE; MACROLIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CYCLIZATION; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG STRUCTURE; DRUG SYNTHESIS; LACTONIZATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

EID: 2142819949     PISSN: 00404020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2004.03.061     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. For preliminary communication, see: Hamada T., Kobayashi Y., Kiyokawa M., Yonemitsu O. Tetrahedron Lett. 44:2003;4343
2. Gaumann E., Hutter R., Keller-Schierlein W., Neipp L., Prelog V., Zahner H. Helv. Chim. Acta. 43:1960;601
3. Muntwyler R., Keller-Schierlein W. Helv. Chim. Acta. 55:1972;460
4. Fragment synthesis: (a) Kotchetkov N.K., Yashunsky D.V., Sviridov A.F., Ermenko M.S. Carbohydr. Res. 200:1990;209
5. Raimundo B.C., Heathcock C.H. Synlett. 1995;1213
6. Paterson I. Tetrahdron Lett. 24:1983;1311
7. seco-Acid synthesis: (d) Raimundo B.C. The total synthesis of the lankanolide seco-acid, dissertation. 1996;University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
8. For example, (a) Stork G., Paterson I., Lee F.K.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:1982;4686
9. Stork G., Rychnovsky S.D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109:1987;1565
10. Woodward R.B., et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103:1981;3213
11. For a previous report related to conformation analysis for synthetic design; see (a) Hamada T. Prediction of macrolactonization results-conformation calculation of macrolide seco-acid derivatives computer aided innovation of new materials II. Part 1. 1993;. p. 829
12. Makino K., Nakajima N., Hashimoto N., Yonemitsu O. Tetrahedron Lett. 37:1996;9077. and references cited therein
13. Goto H., Osawa E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1993;187. We used the latest version 4.02 of conflex working on pc-unix (linux) and using extended MM2 as a force field
14. Osawa E., Goto H., Hata T., Deretey E. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.). 398-399:1997;229
15. (b) For classification in to clusters, see Kunuth D.K. The art of computer programming. Vol. 1:1973;Addison-wiley, Menlo Park, CA. p 279
16. (c) For the definition of cluster distance, see Saunders M. J. Comput. Chem. 12:1991;645
17. 10 The substituents (methyl, phenyl or dimethl group) on the 6-membered ring of the syn-1, 3-diol are far from the backbone chain, we can conclude that the difference in the substituents does not affect the backbone conformation
18. Clode D.M. Chem. Rev. 79:1979;491
19. Paterson I., Arya P. Tetrahedron. 44:1988;253
20. Hamada T., Kobayashi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 44:2003;4347