A Gibbs Point Process for Road Extraction from Remotely Sensed Images

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 121-136

  Stoica, Radu ^a,b   Descombes, Xavier ^a   Zerubia, Josiane ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aerial and satellite images; Candy model; Gibbs point processes; Hypothesis tests; Reversible jump MCMC dynamics; Road extraction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY; ROADS AND STREETS; SIMULATED ANNEALING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

AERIAL AND SATELLITE IMAGES; CANDY MODEL; GIBBS POINT PROCESSES; HYPOTHESIS TESTS; REVERSIBLE JUMP MCMC DYNAMICS; ROAD EXTRACTION;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 2142813785     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000013086.45688.5d     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baddeley, A.J. and van Lieshout, M.N.M. 1993. Stochastic geometry models in high-level vision. In Statistics and Images, Vol. 1, K.V. Mardia and G.K. Kanji (Eds.). Advances in Applied Statistics, a supplement to Journal of Applied Statistics 20:231-256. Abingdon: Carfax.
2. Barzohar, M. and Cooper, D.B. 1996. Automatic finding of main roads in aerial images by using geometric-stochastic models and estimation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18:707-721.
3. Bogess, J.E. 1994. Using artificial neural networks to indentify roads in satellite images. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Neural Networks, San Diego, pp. 410-415.
4. Fua, P. and Leclerc, Y.G. 1990. Model driven edge detection. Machine Vision and Applications, 3:45-56.
5. Fischler, M.A., Tenenbaum, J.M. and Wolf, H.C. 1981. Detection of roads and linear structures in low-resolution aerial imagery using a multisource knowledge integration technique. Computer Graphics and Image Procesing, 15:201-223.
6. Garcin, L., Descombes, X., Zerubia, J. and LeMen, H. 2001. Building detection by Markov object processes and a MCMC algorithm. INRIA Research Report, 4206.
7. Geman, D. and Jedynak, B. 1996. An active testing model for tracking roads in satellite images. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18:1-14.
8. Geyer, C. J. and Møller, J. 1994. Simulation and likelihood inference for spatial point process. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, B, 21:359-373.
9. Geyer, C.J. 1998. Likelihood inference for spatial point processes. In Stochastic Geometry, Likelihood and Computation, O.E. Barndoff-Nielsen, W.S. Kendall and M.N.M. van Lieshout (Eds.), Chapmann and Hall: London.
10. Graffigne, C. and Berlin, I. 1989. Modélisation de réseaux pour l'Imagerie Satellite SPOT. AFCET, 7eme Congrès de Reconnaissance des Formes et Intelligence Artificielle (Paris), pp. 833-842.
11. Green, P. 1995. Reversible jump MCMC computation and bayesian model determination. Biometrika, 82:711-732
12. Green, P. 1996. MCMC in image analysis In Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D.J. Spiegelhalter (Eds.) pp. 381-399, Chapman and Hall: London.
13. van Lieshout, M.N.M. 1994. Stochastic annealing for nearest-neighbour point processes with application to object recognition. Advances in Applied Probability, 26:281-300.
14. van Lieshout, M.N.M. 2000. Markov Point Processes and their Applications. Imperial College Press/World Scientific Publishing: London/Singapore.
15. Merlet, N. and Zerubia, J. 1996. New prospects in line detection by dynamic programming. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18:426-431.
16. Meyn, S.P. and Tweedie, R.L. 1993. Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability Springer-Verlag: London.
17. Møller, J. 1998. Markov Chain Monte Carlo and spatial point processes. In Stochastic Geometry, Likelihood and Computation, O.E. Bamdoff-Nielsen, W.S. Kendall and M.N.M. van Lieshout (Eds.) Chapmann and Hall: London.
18. Neuenschwander, W.M., Fua, P., Iverson, L., Szekely, G. and Kubler, O. 1997. Ziplock Snakes. International Journal of Computer Vision, 25(3):191-201.
19. Ortner, M., Descombes, X. and Zerubia, J. 2002. Building extraction from digital elevation models. INRIA Research Report, 4517.
20. Preston, C.J. 1977. Spatial birth-and-death processes. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 46:371-391.
21. Refregier, P., Germain, O. and Gaidon, T. 1997. Optimal snake segmentation of target and background with independent Gamma density probabilities application to speckled and preprocessed images. Optics Communications, 137:382-388.
22. Robert, C. and Casella, G. 1999. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods Springer-Verlag.
23. Rue, H. and Syversveen, A.R. 1998. Bayesian object oecognition with Baddley's delta loss. Advances in Applied Probability (SGSA), 30(1):55-75.
24. Rue, H. and Hum, M. 1999. Bayesian object identification. Biometrika, (3), 649-660.
25. Ruelle, D. 1969. Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results, W.A. Benjamin: Reading, Massachusetts.
26. Serendero, M.A. 1989. Extraction d'Informations Symboliques en Imagerie SPOT: Réseaux de Communication et Agglomerations. PhD Thesis (in French), Nice-Sophia Antipolis University.
27. Stoica, R. 2001. Processus ponctuels pour l'extraction des réseaux linéiques dans les images satellitaires et aériennes. PhD Thesis (in French), Nice Sophia-Antipolis University.
28. Stoyan, D., Kendall, W.S., and Mecke, J. 1987. Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. John Willey and Sons.
29. Tupin, F., Maître, H., Mangin, J.-F., Nicolas, J.-M. and Pechersky, E. 1998. Detection of linear features in SAR images: Application to road network extraction. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36(2):434-453.