The nutritive value of Prangos ferulacea

Grass and Forage Science

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-19

  Coskun B ^a   Gulsen N ^a   Umucalilar, H D ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Degradability; Digestibility; In vitro gas production; Leaf; Stem

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DEGRADATION; DIGESTIBILITY; FORAGE; NUTRITIVE VALUE;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

ANIMALIA; AVES; BOVIDAE; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; PRANGOS;

EID: 2142786762     PISSN: 01425242     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2004.00398.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AFRC (1992) Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report No. 9. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews (Series B), 62, 787-835.
2. AKKILIÇ M. and SÜRMEN S. (1979) The Laboratory Book of Feedstuffs and Animal Nutrition. Ankara: A.Ü. Basimevi.
3. AOAC (1984) In: Williams S. (ed.) Animal Feed. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis, 14th edn. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.
4. CLOSE W. and MENKE K.H. (1986) Selected Topics in Animal Nutrition. Feldafing, Germany: Deutsche Stiftung für İnternationale Entwicklung.
5. DAVIS P.H. (1972) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 4, pp. 386-387. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh Press.
6. ENSMINGER M.E., OLDFIELD J.E. and HEINEMANN W.W. (1990) Feeds and Nutrition, 2nd edn. Clovis, CA, USA: The Ensminger Publishing Company.
7. FLACHOWSKY G., PEYKER W., SCHNEİDER A. and HENKEL K. (1993) Fibre analyses and in sacco degradability of plant fractions of two corn varieties harvested at various times. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 43, 41-50.
8. GIVENS D.I., MOSS A.R. and ADAMSON A.H. (1992) The chemical composition and energy value of high temperature dried grass produced in England. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 36, 215-228.
9. GOERING H.K. and VAN SOEST P.J. (1970) Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications). Agricultural Handbook 379. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.
10. GÜLŞEN N. and İNAL F. (1995) The importance of forage and its problems in Turkey. Türk Veteriner Hekimliǧi Dergisi, 7, 48-52.
11. MCDONALD P. (1981) A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 96, 251-252.
12. MENKE K.H. and STEINGASS H. (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28, 7-55.
13. MOSS A.R., GIVENS D.I. and PHIPPS R.H. (1992) Digestibility and energy value of combinations of forage mixtures. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 39, 151-172.
14. NANDRA K.S., HENDRY A. and DOBOS R.C. (1993) A study of voluntary intake and digestibility of roughages in relation to their degradation characteristics and retention time in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 43, 227-237.
15. NRC (1989) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 6th revised edn. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
16. SPSS (1993) SPSS for Windows. Release 6.0. Chicago, IL, USA: SPSS Inc.
17. TILLEY J.M.A. and TERRY R.A. (1963) A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forages. Journal of British Grassland Society, 18, 104-111.
18. VOGEL K.P., PEDERSEN J.F., MASTERSON S.D. and TOY J.J. (1999) Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, ADF, and IVDMD forage analysis. Crop Science, 39, 276-279.
19. WILMAN D. and ADESOGAN A. (2000) A comparison of filter bag methods with conventional tube methods of determining the in vitro digestibility of forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 84, 33-47.