Tunable Nonlocal Spin Control in a Coupled-Quantum Dot System

Science

Volumn 304, Issue 5670, 2004, Pages 565-567

  Craig, N J ^a   Taylor, J M ^a   Lester, E A ^a   Marcus, C M ^a   Hanson, M P ^b   Gossard, A C ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONS; GROUND STATE; IMPURITIES; METALS; QUANTUM THEORY;

COUPLED-QUANTUM DOT SYSTEMS; TUNABLE NONLOCAL SPIN CONTROLS;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

PHYSICS;

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; ELECTRON; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAGNETISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 2142771096     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1095452     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. An introductory review of the Kondo effect in quantum dots is available in L. Kouwenhoven, L. Glazman, Physics World 14, 33 (2001).
2. L. I. Glazman, M. E. Raikh, JETP Lett. 47, 452 (1988).
3. T. K. Ng, P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1768 (1988).
4. Y. Meir, N. S. Wingreen, P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2601 (1993).
5. D. Goldhaber-Gordon et al., Nature 391, 156 (1998).
6. A recent review of double quantum dots, with extensive citations to the literature, is available in W. G. van der Wiel et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1 (2003).
7. H. Jeong, A. M. Chang, M. R. Melloch, Science 293, 2221 (2001).
8. J. C. Chen, A. M. Chang, M. R. Melloch Matter 1, cond-mat/0305289 (2003).
9. D. Loss, E. V. Sukhorukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1035 (2000).
10. D. Loss, D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A. 57, 120 (1998).
11. M. A. Ruderman, C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 96, 99 (1954).
12. T. Kasuya, Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 45 (1956).
13. K. Yosida, Phys. Rev. 106, 893 (1957).
14. A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions: (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993).
15. C. Jayaprakash, H. R. Krishnamurthy, J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 737 (1981).
16. B. A. Jones, C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 843 (1987).
17. B. A. Jones, C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 40, 324 (1989).
18. A. Georges, V. Meir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3508 (1999).
19. R. Aguado, D. C. Langreth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1946 (2000).
20. W. Izumida, O. Sakai, Phys. Rev. B 62, 10260 (2000).
21. T. Aono, M. Eto, Phys. Rev. B 63, 12S327 (2001).
22. R. Aguado, D. C. Langreth, Phys. Rev. B 67, 245307 (2003).
23. V. N. Golovach, D. Loss, Europhys. Lett. 62, 83 (2003).
24. V. Utsumi, J. Martinek, P. Bruno, H. Imamura, condmat/0310168 (2003).
25. -2 give a transport mean free path of ∼2.0 μm in the unpatterned material.
26. C. M. Varma, personal communication.
27. N. J. Craig et al., data not shown.
28. T. J. Osborne, M. A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. A. 66, 032110 (2002).
29. A. Saguia, M. S. Sarandy, Phys. Rev. A. 67, 012315 (2003).
30. F. Verstraete, M. Popp, J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027901 (2004).
31. We thank C. Varma, B. Halperin, and A. Yacoby for useful discussion. Supported in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)-Quantum Information Science and Technology (QuIST) program, the Army Research Office under DAAD-19-02-1-0070 and DAAD-19-99-1-0215, and the NSF-Nanoscate Science and Engineering Center program at Harvard. Research at UCSB was supported in part by iQUIST. Supported by the Harvard College Research Program (N.J.C.), NSF (J.M.T.), and Middlebury Cottege (E.A.L.).