Dynamic Selection Effects in Means-Tested, Urban School Voucher Programs

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 225-250

  Howell, William G ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142770184     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barnard, J., Frangakis, C., Hill, J.,&Rubin, D. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(June), 299-311.
2. Beales, J.,&Wahl, M. (1996). Private vouchers in Milwaukee: The PAVE Program. In T. Moe (Ed.), Private vouchers (pp. 41-73). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
3. Betts, J.,&Fairlie, R. (2001). Explaining ethnic, racial, and immigrant differences in private school attendance. Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 26-51.
4. Brighouse, H. (2000). School choice and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Buddin, R., Cordes, J.,&Kirby, S. (1998). School choice in California: Who chooses private schools? Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 110-134.
6. Chubb, J.,&Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7. Elmore, R.,&Fuller, B. (1996). Empirical research on educational choice: What are the implications for policy-makers? In B. Fuller&R.F. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice. New York: Columbia Teachers College Press.
8. Epple, D.,&Romano, R. (1998). Competition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer-group effects. American Economic Review, 88, 33-62.
9. Figlio, D.,&Stone, J. (2001). Can public policy affect private school cream skimming? Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 240-266.
10. Fiske, E.,&Ladd, H. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Friedman, M. (1955). The role of government in education. In R. Solo (Ed.), Economics and the public interest (pp. 123-144). New York: Rutgers University Press.
12. Gewirtz, S., Ball, S.,&Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Berkeley, CA: Open University Press.
13. Heise, M., Colburn, K.,&Lamberti, J. (1995). Private vouchers in Indianapolis: The Golden Rule Program. In T. Moe (Ed.), Private vouchers (pp. 100-119). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
14. Hochschild, J.,&Scovronick, N. (2003). The American dream and the public schools. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Howell, W.,&Peterson, P., with Wolf, P.,&Campbell, D. (2002). The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Howell, W., Wolf, P., Campbell, D.,&Peterson, P. (2002). School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(2), 191-218.
17. Hsieh, C.,&Urquiola, M. (2002). When schools compete, how do they compete? An assessment of Chile's nationwide school voucher program. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Occasional Paper No. 43. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
18. Ladd, H. (2002). School vouchers: A critical view. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 3-24.
19. Ladd, H.,&Fiske, E. (2001). The Uneven Playing Field of School Choice: Evidence from New Zealand. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(Winter): 43-63.
20. Lankford, R.,&Wyckoff, J. (1992). Primary and secondary school choice among public and religious alternatives. Economics of Education Review, 11, 317-337.
21. Levin, H. (1998). Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(June), 373-392.
22. Long, J.,&Toma, E. (1988). The determinant of private school attendance, 1970-1980. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 351-356.
23. Manski, C. (1992). Educational choice (vouchers) and social mobility. Economics of Education Review, 11, 351-369.
24. Martinez, V., Godwin, K., Kemerer, F.,&Perna, L. (1995). The consequences of school choice: Who leaves and who stays in the inner-city. Social Science Quarterly, 73(3), 485-501.
25. McEwan, P. (2000). The effectiveness of public, catholic, and non-religious private schools in Chile's voucher system. Education Economics, 9, 103-128.
26. McEwan, P.,&Carnoy, M. (1999). The impact of competition on public school quality: Longitudinal evidence from Chile's voucher system. Stanford University, Mimeo.
27. Moe, T.M. (2001). Schools, vouchers, and the American public. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
28. Moe, T.,&Shotts, K. (1995). Computer models of educational institutions: The case of vouchers and social equity. In R. Crowson, W. Boyd,&H. Mawhinney (Eds.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism: Reinventing the American school (pp. 69-91). London: New Falmer Press.
29. Nechyba, T. (2000). Mobility, targeting, and private school vouchers. American Economic Review, 90, 210-244.
30. Peterson, P., Campbell, D.,&West, M. (2002). Who chooses? Who uses? Participation in a national school voucher program. In P. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 51-84). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
31. Peterson, P.,&Howell, W. (2000). What happens to low-income New York students when they switch from public to private schools. In D. Ravitch&J. Viteritti (Eds.), City schools: Lessons from New York. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. Peterson, P., Myers, D.,&Howell, W. (1999). An evaluation of the Horizon Scholarship Program in the Edgewood Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas: The first year. Program on Education Policy and Governance Research Paper 99-03. Cambridge, MA.
33. Peterson, P., Myers, D., Howell, W.,&Mayer, D. (1999). Effect of vouchers on student test scores in New York City. In S. Mayer&P. E. Peterson (Eds.), Earning and learning: How schools matter (pp. 317-340). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34. Ruggles, S.,&Sobek, M. (1997). Integated public use microdata series: Version 2.0 Minneapolis: Historical Census Projects, University of Minnesota
35. Schneider, M., Teske, P.,&Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Teske, P.,&Schneider, M. (2001). What research can tell policymakers about school choice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(Winter), 609-631.
37. Witte, J. (2000). The market approach to education: An analysis of America's first voucher program. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.