Improving stakeholder knowledge and agency image through collaborative planning

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 220-231

  Lafon, Nelson W ^a,b,d,e,f   McMullin, Steve L ^b,g,h,i   Steffen, David E ^b,c,d,j,k,l   Schulman, Robert S ^b,m,n,o  

^a VA Dept of Game and Inland Fish   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VA Dept of Game and Inland Fish   (United States)

^d Virginia Dept Game and Inland Fish   (United States)

^e USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^f Virginia Chapter   (United States)

^g Wildl and Parks

^h Fisheries Management Bureau

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^j Mississippi Dept Fish Wildl P   (United States)

^k LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l OUSD(AT and L) TWS LW and M   (United States)

^m CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Black bear; Knowledge; Opinions; Participation; Planning; Stakeholder; Survey; Ursus americanus

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SPECIES CONSERVATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

URSUS; URSUS AMERICANUS;

EID: 2142764104     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[220:ISKAAI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. BAPTISE, M. E., J. B. WHELAN, AND R. B. FRARY. 1979. Visitor perception of black bear problems at Shenandoah National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin 7: 25-29.
2. CARPENTER, L. H., D. J. DECKER, AND J. F. LIPSCOMB. 2000. Stakeholder acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 5-19.
3. CHASE, L. C., T. M. SCHUSLER, AND D. J. DECKER. 2000. Innovations in stakeholder involvement: what's the next step? Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 208-217.
4. CHASE, L. C., W. F. SIEMER, AND D. J. DECKER. 2002. Designing stakeholder involvement strategies to resolve wildlife management controversies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 937-950.
5. COOK, T. D., AND D. T. CAMPBELL. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
6. CROMPTON, J. L., C. W. LAMB, AND P. SCHUL. 1981. The attitude of public agencies toward public participation as perceived by their senior administrators. Journal of the Community Development Society 12: 21-31.
7. DECKER, D. J. 1985. Agency image: a key to successful natural resources management. Transactions of the Northeast Section of Wildlife Society 42: 43-56.
8. DILLMAN, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
9. DOLSEN, D. E., AND G. E. MACHLIS. 1991. Response rates and mail recreation survey results: how much is enough? Journal of Leisure Research 23: 272-277.
10. GODSCHALK, D. R., AND B. STIFTEL. 1981. Making waves: public participation in state water planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17: 597-614.
11. GRISE, L. D. 1994. Assessing stakeholder preferences regarding current and future bear management options. Thesis, Michigan State University, Lansing, USA.
12. HATTEN, T. S., AND S. K. RUHLAND. 1995. Student attitude toward entrepreneurship as affected by participation in an SBI program. Journal of Education for Business 70: 224-227.
13. JONKER, S. A., J. A. PARKHURST, R. FIELD, AND T. K. FULLER. 1998. Black bear depredation on agricultural commodities in Massachusetts. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 318-324.
14. LAFON, N. W. 2002. Evolution of stakeholder knowledge, attitudes, and opinions throughout a participative process to develop a management plan for black bears in Virginia. Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA.
15. LAFON, N. W., S. L. MCMULLIN, AND D. E. STEFFEN. 2003. Knowledge and opinions of stakeholders of black bear management in Virginia. Ursus 14: 55-64.
16. LANDRE, B. K., AND B. A. KNUTH. 1993. Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin. Society and Natural Resources 6: 229-257.
17. LEEMING, F. C., B. E. PORTER, W. O. DWYER, M. K. COBERN, AND D. P. OLIVER. 1997. Effects of participation in class activities on children's environmental attitudes and knowledge. The Journal of Environmental Education 28: 33-42.
18. LEVINE, J., AND J. BUTLER. 1952. Lecture vs. group decision in changing behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 36: 29-33.
19. LLOYD, M. A. 1973. The effects of active versus passive participation on ego-involved attitudes: changes in knowledge and attitudes following a life planning workshop for college women. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
20. MARENIN, O. 1989. Implementing national unity: changes in national consciousness among participants in the National Youth Services Corps of Nigeria. Journal of Ethnic Studies 17: 23-44.
21. MCCONNELL, W. V. 1977. Public involvement and attitude change within the U. S. Forest Service. Thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
22. MCIVOR, D. E., AND M. R. CONOVER. 1994. Perceptions of farmers and non-farmers toward management of problem wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22: 212-219.
23. MCLAUGHLIN, C. R. 1999. Fifteenth Eastern Black Bear Workshop, one perspective from a northeastern state. International Bear News 8: 17.
24. MCMULLIN, S. L. 1996. Natural resource management and leadership in public arena decision making: a prescriptive framework. Pages 54-63 in L. E. Miranda and D. R. DeVries, editors. Multidimensional approaches to reservoir fisheries management. American Fisheries Society Symposium 16, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
25. MCMULLIN, S. L., M. D. DUDA, AND B. A. WRIGHT. 2000. House Bill 38 and future directions for the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries: results of constituent and staff studies and recommendations for future action. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, and Responsive Management, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
26. MCMULLIN, S. L., AND L. A. NIELSEN. 1991. Public involvement in natural resources allocation. Pages 87-100 in W. R. Mangun, editor. Public policy issues in wildlife management. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, USA.
27. MOOTE, M. A., M. P. MCCLARAN, AND D. K. CHICKERING. 1997. Theory in practice: applying participatory democracy theory to public land planning. Environmental Management 21: 877-889.
28. PEEK, J. M. 1998. Experiences with a committee of user groups examining grizzly bear restoration in Idaho. Ursus 10: 613-614.
29. SAMPLE, V. A. 1993. A framework for public participation in natural resource decision making. Journal of Forestry 91: 22-27.
30. STOUT, R. J., D. J. DECKER, B. A. KNUTH, J. C. PROUD, AND D. H. NELSON. 1996. Comparison of three public-involvement approaches for stakeholder input into deer management decisions: a case study. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 312-317.
31. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND INLAND FISHERIES (VDGIF). 1999. Virginia deer management plan. Wildlife Information Publication No. 99-1, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
32. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND INLAND FISHERIES (VDGIF). 2002. Virginia black bear management plan. Richmond, Virginia, USA.
33. WONDOLLECK, J. M., AND S. L. YAFFEE. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resources management. Island Press, Washington D. C., USA.
34. ZURCHER, L. A., JR. 1970. The poverty board: some consequences of "maximum feasible participation." Journal of Social Issues 26: 85-10.