Use of the TOMM in a criminal court forensic assessment setting

Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 370-381

  Delain, Sheryl L ^a   Stafford, Kathleen P ^a,b   Ben Porath, Yossef S ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Court Psycho Diagnostic Clinic ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Forensic; Malingering; Memory; TOMM

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRIME; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MALINGERING; MEMORY; MENTAL CAPACITY; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; RANDOMIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; CRIME; FEMALE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; MALE; MALINGERING; MEMORY; MENTAL COMPETENCY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 2142743803     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: 15523489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073191103259156     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Bash, I. Y., & Alpert, M. (1980). The determination of malingering. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 347, 86-99.
3. Beetar, J. T., & Williams, J. N. (1995). Malingering response styles on the memory assessment scales and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 57-72.
4. Boardman, A. F. (1996). A comparative investigation of insanity acquittees and unsuccessful insanity evaluatees. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 56(12B), 7038.
5. Cercey, S. P., Schretlen, D. J., & Brandt, J. (1997). Simulated amnesia and the pseudo-memory phenomena. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed., pp. 85-107). New York: Guilford.
6. Colby, F. (2001a). Using the binomial distribution to assess effort: Forced-choice testing in neuropsychological settings. NeuroRehabilitation, 16, 253-265.
7. Colby, F. (2001b). Using the binomial distribution to assess effort: Forced-choice testing in neuropsychological settings: Reply. NeuroRehabilitation, 16, 311-312.
8. Frederick, R. I. (2001). Comment on Faulder Colby "Using the binomial distribution to assess effort: Forced-choice testing in neuropsychological settings." NeuroRehabilitation, 16, 309.
9. Frederick, R. I., & Foster, H. G. (1991). Multiple measures of malingering on a forced-choice test of cognitive ability. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 3, 596-602.
10. Greiffenstein, M. F., Gola, T., & Baker, W. J. (1995). MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in detection of factitious traumatic brain injury. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9(3), 230-240.
11. Hartlage, L. C. (1998). Clinical detection of malingering. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 239-260). New York: Plenum.
12. Lamb, D. G., & Prigatano, G. P. (2000). Malingering and feigned memory disorders. In G. E. Berrios & J. R. Hodges (Eds.), Memory Disorders in Psychiatric Practice (pp. 456-478). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lambert, J. B. (2000). Analysis of the Rey 15-Item Memory Test as a measure of malingering in a litigating, mildly brain-injured sample. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 60(8B), 4231.
14. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
16. Mossman, D. (2003). Daubert, cognitive malingering, and test accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 27(3), 229-249.
17. Rees, L. M., Tombaugh, T. N., & Boulay, L. (2001). Depression and the Test of Memory Malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 501-506.
18. Rees, L. M., Tombaugh, T. N., Gansler, D. A., & Moczynski, N. P. (1998). Five validation experiments of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Psychological Assessment, 10, 10-20.
19. Reynolds, C. (1998). Detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Plenum.
20. Rogers, R. (1986). Conducting insanity evaluations. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
21. Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
22. Rogers, R. (1998). Assessment of malingering on psychological measures. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill, III (Eds.), Psychologists' desk reference (pp. 53-57). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of malingering and deception. In A. M. Goldstein & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 109-129). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
24. Rogers, R., Harrell, E. H., & Liff, C. D. (1993). Feigning neuropsychological impairment: A critical review of methodological and clinical considerations. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 255-274.
25. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Goldstein, A. (1994). Explanatory models of malingering: A prototypical analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 543-552.
26. Rogers, R., & Shuman, D. W. (2000). Conducting insanity evaluations. New York: Guilford.
27. Smith, G., & Haley, J. A. (1998, Spring). Test of Memory Malingering [test review]. American Psychology-Law Society News, 16, 29-30.
28. Spreen, O., & Strauss, A. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(4), 495-505.
30. Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). New York: Multi-Health Systems.
31. Tombaugh, T. N. (1997). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Psychological Assessment, 9, 260-268.
32. Tombaugh, T. N. (2002). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in forensic psychology. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3-4), 69-96.
33. Vallabhajosula, B., & van Gorp, W. G. (2001). Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 207-215.
34. Villanueva, M., & Binder, L. (1993). Association between MMPI-2 validity indices and the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 106.
35. Zillmer, E. A., & Perry, W. (1996). Cognitive-neuropsychological abilities and related psychological disturbance: A factor model of neuropsychological, Rorschach, and MMPI indices. Assessment, 3, 209-224.