Remote viewing by committee: RV using a multiple agent / multiple percipient design

Journal of Parapsychology

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 325-342

  Storm, Lance ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142714433     PISSN: 00223387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BEM, D. J., PALMER, J., & BROUGHTON, R. S. (2001). Updating the ganzfeld database: A victim of its own success? Journal of Parapsychology, 65, 207-218.
2. BRAUD, W. (1977). Long-distance dream and presleep telepathy [Abstract]. In J. D. Morris, W. G. Roll, & R. L. Morris (Eds.), Research in parapsychology 1976 (pp. 154-155). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
3. BURDICK, D. S., & KELLY, E. F. (1977). Statistical methods in parapsychology. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology (pp. 81-130). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
4. DOBYNS, Y. H., DUNNE, B. J., JAHN, R. G., & NELSON, R. D. (1992). Response to Hansen, Utts, and Markwick: Statistical and methodological problems of the PEAR remote viewing experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 56, 115-146.
5. DUNNE, B. J., JAHN, R. G., & NELSON, R. D. (1983). Precognitive remote perception. Technical Note PEAR 83003. Princeton University Engineering Anomalies Research, Princeton University, School of Engineering/Applied Science.
6. DUNNE, B. J., DOBYNS, Y. H., & INTERS, S. J. (1989). Precognitive remote perception III. Complete binary data base with analytical refinements. Technical Note PEAR 89002. Princeton University Engineering Anomalies Research, Princeton University, School of Engineering/Applied Science.
7. EDWARDS, T. (Producer). (1984). The case of ESP. London: Horizon/BBC.
8. HANSEN, G. P., UTTS, J., & MARKWICK, B. (1992). Critique of the PEAR remote-viewing experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 56, 97-113.
9. HONORTON, C. (1985). Meta-analysis of psi ganzfeld research: A response to Hyman. Journal of Parapsychology, 49, 51-91.
10. HYMAN, R. (1985). The ganzfeld psi experiment: A critical appraisal. Journal of Parapsychology, 49, 3-49.
11. HYMAN, R. (1995). Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena. Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 321-351.
12. HYMAN, R. (1996). Evaluation of a program on anomalous mental phenomena. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 10, 31-58.
13. JAHN, R. G., & DUNNE, B. J. (1987). Margins of reality: The role of consciousness in the physical world. New York: Harcourt Brace.
14. KANTHAMANI, H., & KHILJI, A. (1990). An experiment in ganzfeld and dreams: A confirmatory study. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 33rd Annual Convention, 126-137.
15. LANTZ, N. D., LUKE, W. L. W., & MAY, E. C. (1994). Target and sender dependencies in anomalous cognition experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 58, 285-302.
16. MASKS, D. (2000). The psychology of the psychic. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
17. MARKS, D., & KAMMANN, R. (1978). Information transmission in remote viewing experiments. Nature, 274, 680-681.
18. MCMONEAGLE, J. (1997). Mind trek: Exploring consciousness, time, and space through remote viewing. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Road.
19. MCMONEAGLE, J. (2000). Remote viewing secrets: A handbook. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads.
20. MILTON, J. (1998). A meta-analysis of waking state of consciousness, free-response ESP studies. In N. L. Zingrone & M. J. Schlitz (Eds.). Research in parapsychology 1993 (pp. 31-34). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
21. MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (1999). Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 387-391.
22. MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (2001). Does psi exist? Reply to Storm and Ertel (2001). Psychological Bulletin, 127, 434-438.
23. MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (2002). Reply to Storm and Ertel (2002). Journal of Parapsychology, 66, 183-186.
24. MUMFORD, M. D., ROSE, A. M., & GOSLIN, D. A. (1995). An evaluation of remote viewing: Research and applications. The American Institutes for Research report. September 29.
25. OWEN, I. M., & SPARROW, M. (1976). Conjuring up Philip: An adventure in psychokinesis. Ontario, Canada: Fitzpenny & Whiteside.
26. PAGANO, R. R. (1986). Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: West Publishing.
27. PUTHOFF, H. (1996). CIA-initiated remote viewing program at Stanford Research Institute. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 10, 63-76.
28. RHINE, J. B., & PRATT, J. G. (1962). Parapsychology: Frontier science of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. (Original work published 1957)
29. ROGO, D. S. (1986). Mind over matter. London: Aquarian Press.
30. SCHMEIDLER, G. R. (1994). ESP experiments 1978-1992: The glass is half full. In S. Krippner (Ed.), Advances in parapsychological research 7 (pp. 104-197). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
31. SCHLITZ, M., & GRUBER, E. (1980). Transcontinental remote viewing. Journal of Parapsychology, 44, 305-317.
32. SCHLITZ, M., & GRUBER, E. (1981). Transcontinental remote viewing: A rejudging. Journal of Parapsychology, 45, 233-237.
33. SCHLITZ, M., & HAIGHT, J. (1984). Remote viewing revisited: An intrasubject replication. Journal of Parapsychology, 48, 39-49.
34. SINCLAIR, U. (1930/1962). Mental radio (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. (Original work published 1930)
35. SOLFVTN, G. F., KELLY, E. F., & BURDICK, D. S. (1978). Some new methods of analysis for preferential-ranking data. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 72, 93-14.
36. STORM L., & ERTEL, S. (2001). Does psi exist? Comments on Milton and Wiseman's (1999) meta-analysis of ganzfeld research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 424-433.
37. STORM L., & ERTEL, S. (2002). The ganzfeld debate continued: A response to Milton and Wiseman (2001). Journal of Parapsychology, 66, 73-82.
38. STORM, L., & MITCHELL, C. (2003). "Are you there, Spenser?" Attempts at 'PK by committee' in a séance-like situation. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 3, 3-19.
39. STORM, L., & THALBOURNE, M. A. (2000). A paradigm shift away from the ESP-PK dichotomy: The theory of psychopraxia. Journal of Parapsychology, 64, 279-300.
40. TARG, R. (1996). Remote viewing at Stanford Research Institute in the 1970s: A memoir. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 10, 77-88.
41. TARG, R., & KATRA, J. (1995). Miracles of mind: Exploring nonlocal consciousness and spiritual healing. Novato, CA: New World Library.
42. TARG, R., & PUTHOFF, H. (1974). Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding. Nature, 251, 602-607.
43. THALBOURNE, M. A. (1982). A glossary of terms used in parapsychology. London: Heinemann.
44. THALBOURNE, M. A. (2002). The common thread between ESP and PK. NY: Parapsychology Foundation.
45. UTTS, J. (1995a). An assessment of the evidence for psychic functioning. Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 289-320.
46. UTTS, J. (1995b). Response to Hyman's report "Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena." Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 353-356.
47. UTTS, J. (1996a). An assessment of the evidence for psychic functioning. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 10, 3-30.
48. UTTS, J. (1996b). Response to Hyman. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 10, 59-61.
49. WISEMAN, R., & MILTON, J. (1998). Experiment one of the SAIC remote viewing program: A critical re-evaluation. Journal of Parapsychology, 62, 297-308.