Using traffic light information as navigational cues: Implications for navigation system design

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 119-134

  Ross, Tracy ^a   May, Andrew J ^a   Grimsley, Paul J ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design; Traffic lights; Vehicle navigation system

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142694322     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2004.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alm H. Drivers' cognitive models of routes In Rothengatter J.A. (Ed.), Laboratory and field studies on route representation and drivers' cognitive models of routes (DRIVE II V1041 GIDS, Deliverable GIDS/NAV2) 1990 35-48 University of Groningen, Traffic Research Centre Groningen, The Netherlands
2. Alm, H., Nilsson, L., Jarmark, S., Savelid, J., & Hennings, U. (1992). The effects of landmark presentation on driver performance and uncertainty in a navigation task - a field study (No. S/IT-4) (Swedish Prometheus, Tech. Rep. No. S/IT-4). Linköping, Sweden: VTI
3. Barrow, K. (1991). Human factors issues surrounding the implementation of in-vehicle navigation and information systems (SAE Tech. Paper Series No. 910870). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automobile Engineers
4. Bengler, K., Haller, R., & Zimmer, A. (1994). Experimental optimisation of route guidance information using context information. Paper presented at the First World Congress on Applications of Transport and Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems, Paris, France
5. Burnett, G. E. (1998). Turn right at the King's Head: Drivers' requirements for route guidance information. Unpublished PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK
6. Burnett G. 'Turn right at the traffic lights': The requirement for landmarks in vehicle navigation systems Journal of Navigation 53 3 2000 499-510
7. Burnett G.E. Joyner S.M. An assessment of moving map and symbol-based route guidance systems In Noy Y.I. (Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces 1997 115-136 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
8. Burnett G.E. May A.J. Ross T. The prediction of the effectiveness of landmarks for use within a route guidance System 1994 HUSAT Research Institute Loughborough University, UK
9. Burns, P. (1997). Navigation and the older driver. Unpublished PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK
10. Davis, J. R., & Schmandt, C. M. (1989). The back seat driver: real time spoken driving instructions. Paper presented at the Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems, Toronto, Canada
11. Evans G.W. Skorpanich A.A. Garling T. Bryant K.J. Bresolin B. The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks and stress on environmental cognition Journal of Environmental Psychology 4 4 1984 323-335
12. Fastenmeier, W., Haller, R., & Lerner, G. (1994). A preliminary safety evaluation of route guidance comparing different MMI concepts. Paper presented at the World Congress, Paris
13. Green, P., Hoekstra, E., Williams, M., Wen, C., & George, K. (1993). Examination of a videotape-based method to evaluate the usability of route guidance and traffic information systems (Final No. UMTRI-93-31): (Tech. Rep. No. UMTRI-93-31). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
14. Green, P., Levison, W., Paelke, G., & Serafin, C. (1995). Preliminary Human Factors Design guidelines for driver information systems (No. FHWA-RD-94-087): US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
15. King G.F. Driver performance in highway navigation tasks Transportation Research Record 1093 1986 1-11
16. May A.J. Ross T. Bayer S.H. Drivers' information requirements when navigating in an urban environment Journal of Navigation 56 2002 89-100
17. May A.J. Ross T. Duffield J.M. Development of a model for predicting the navigational effectiveness of landmarks (EPSRC LINK Inland Surface Transport Programme REGIONAL Project Deliverable 3) 2002 Ergonomics and Safety Research Institute Loughborough University, UK
18. OECD. (1988). Route guidance and in-car communication systems (Report prepared by OECD scientific experts group). Paris: Organisation and Economic Co-operation and Development
19. Philips, B. H. (1999). The role of landmark information in intelligent navigation displays. Paper presented at the Houston... we have a solution! In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 43rd annual meeting. Santa Monica, California: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
20. Ross, T., May, A. J., Duffield, J. M., Paszkowicz, S. (2002). Driver reaction to navigation instructions incorporating good and poor landmarks (EPSRC LINK Inland Surface Transport Programme REGIONAL Project Deliverable 4). Loughborough University, UK: Ergonomics and Safety Research Institute
21. Rowell J.M. Applying map databases to advanced navigation and driver assistance systems Journal of Navigation 54 3 2001 355-363
22. Streeter L.A. Vitello D. A profile of drivers' map-reading abilities Human Factors 28 2 1986 223-239
23. Wierwille W.W. Antin J.F. Dingus T.A. Hulse M.C. Visual attentional demand of an in-car navigation display system Gale A.G. Vision in vehicles II 1989 307-316 Elsevier Science London
24. Zaidel D.M. Noy Y.I. Automatic versus interactive vehicle navigation aids In Noy Y.I. (Ed.), Ergonomics of intelligent driver interfaces 1997 287-307 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mawaha, NJ