Visual costs of the inhomogeneity of luminance and contrast by viewing lcd-tft screens off-axis

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 515-525

  Ziefle, Martina ^a   Groeger, Thomas ^a   Sommer, Dietmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anisotropic characteristics; Contrast; Luminance; Off axis; Tft LCD; Viewing angle; Visual performance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER TERMINAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; LIGHT; MALE; PHOTOMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER TERMINALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; LIGHTING; MALE; PHOTOMETRY; POSTURE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2142679349     PISSN: 10803548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2003.11076587     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Groeger, Th., Ziefle, M., & Sommer, D. (2003). Anisotropic characteristics of LCD-TFTs and their impact on visual performance: “Everything’s superior with TFTs?”. In D. Harris, V. Duffy, M. Smith, & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Human centred computing: Congnitive social and ergonomic aspects (pp. 33–37). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
2. Hollands, J.G., Cassidy, H.A., McFadden, S., & Boothby, R. (2001). LCD versus CRT displays: Visual search for colored symbols. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 1553–1557). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors Society.
3. Hollands, J.G., McFadden, S., Cassidy, H.A., & Boothby, R. (2000). Visual search performance on LCD and CRT displays: An experimental comparison. In Society for Information Displays (SID), International Symposion Digest of Technical Paper’s (pp. 292–295). San Jose, CA, USA: Society for Information Display.
4. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2001). Ergonomic requirements for work with visual displays based on Hat panels—Part 2: Ergonomic requirements for Hat panel displays (Standard No. ISO 13406-2:2001). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
5. Johnson, C., & Casson, E. (1995). Effects of luminance, contrast and blur on visual activity. Optometry and Visual Science, 72(12), 864–869.
6. Menozzi, M., Näpflin, U., & Krueger, H. (1999). CRT vs LCD: A pilot study on visual performance and suitability of two display technologies for use in office work. Displays, 20, 3–10.
7. Ziefle, M. (2001a). CRT screens or TFT display? A detailed analysis of TFT screens for reading efficiency. In M. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris, & R. Koubek (Eds.). Usability evaluation and interface design (pp. 549–553). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
8. Ziefle, M. (2001b). Aging, visual performance and eyestrain in different screen technologies. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 262–267). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors Society.
9. Ziefle, M. (2001c). User productivity and different screen technologies: CRT screens with high refresh rates vs LCD displays? The Display Search Monitor, 6(14), 11–14.
10. Ziefle, M. (2002). Visual performance in CRT and LCD displays in different user groups. The Display Search Monitor, 7(7), 85–88.