Machiavellian beliefs and social influence

Western Journal of Speech Communication

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 1987, Pages 279-303

  O’Hair, Dan ^a   Cody, Michael J ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142671736     PISSN: 01936700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10570318709374272     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bettinghaus, L., Cody, M. J. (1987). Persuasive Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2. Boster, F. J., Stiff, J. B. (1984). Compliance-gaining message selection behavior. Human Communication Research, 10, 539-556.
3. Christie, R., Geis, F. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
4. Christie, R., Geis, F. (1970). Implications and speculations. In R. Christie and F. Geis (Eds.), Studies in machiavellianism (pp. 338-359). New York: Academic Press.
5. Clark, R. A. (1979). The impact of self-interest and desire for liking on the selection of communicative strategies. Communication Monographs, 46, 257-273.
6. Clark, R. A., Delia, J. G. (1979). Topoi and rhetorical competence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 187-206.
7. Cody, M. J., Greene, J. O., Marston, P. J., O’Hair, H. D., Baaske, K. T., Schneider, M. J. (1986). Situation perception and message strategy selection. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 9 (pp. 390-420). Beverly Hills: Sage.
8. Cody, M. J., McLaughlin, M. L. (1980). Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 47, 132-148.
9. Cody, M. J., McLaughlin, M. L. (1985). Models for the sequential construction of accounting episodes: Situational and interactional constraints on message selection and evaluation. In R. L. Street, Jr. J. N. Cappella (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communication behaviour (pp. 50-69). London: Edward Arnold.
10. Cody, M. J., McLaughlin, M. L. (1985). The situation as a construct in interpersonal communication research. In M. L. Knapp &G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 263-312). Beverly Hills: Sage.
11. Cody, M. J., McLaughlin, M. L., Schneider, M. J. (1981). The impact of relational consequences and intimacy on the selection of interpersonal persuasion tactics: A reanalysis. Communication Quarterly, 29, 91-106.
12. Cody, M. J. T., O’Hair, H. D., Schneider, M. (1982). The impact of intimacy, rights to resist, and machiavellianism on compliance resisting strategies: How pervasive are response effects in communication surveys? Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Boston.
13. Cody, M. J., Woelfel, M. L., Jordan, W. J. (1983). Dimensions of compliance-gaining situations. Human Communication Research, 9, 99-113.
14. De Turck, M. A. (1985). A transactional analysis of compliance-gaining behavior: Effects of noncompliance, relational contexts, and actors’ gender. Human Communication Research, 12, 54-78.
15. Dillard, J. P., Burgeon, M. (1985). Situational influences on the selection of compliance- gaining messages: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52, 289-304.
16. Dixon, W. J., Brown, M. B. (1979). Biomedical computer programs: P-series. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1097-1126.
18. Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360-392.
19. Falbo, T. (1977). A multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 537-547.
20. Falbo, T., &Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618-628.
21. Fitzpatrick, M. A., Winke, J. (1979). You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 27, 3-11.
22. Gemmill, G. R., Heisler, W. J. (1972). Machiavellianism as a factor in managerial job strain, job satisfaction, and upward mobility. Academy of Management Journal, 15, 51-62.
23. Goodstadt, B. E., Hjelle, L. A. (1973). Power to the powerless: Locus of control and the use of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 190-196.
24. Hunter, J. E., Gerbing, D. W., Boster, F. J. (1982). Machiavellian beliefs and personality: Construct invalidity of the machiavellianism dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1293-1305.
25. Hunter, J. E., Boster, F. J. (1978). Compliance gaining message selection experiments: Some evidence for an empathy model Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Minneapolis, MN.
26. Hunter, J. E., Boster, F. J. (1979). Situational differences in the selection of compliance-gaining messages.
27. Hunter, J. E., Boster, F. J. (1981). Message content and situational differences as determinants of compliance-gaining message selection. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI.
28. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.
29. McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J., Robey, C. S. (1980). Situational influences on the selection of strategies to resist compliance-gaining attempts. Human Communication Research, 7, 14-36.
30. Harwell, G. S., &Schmitt, D. R. (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30, 350-364.
31. Michener, H. A., Schwertfeger, M. (1975). Liking as a determinant of power tactic preference. Sociometry, 35, 190-202.
32. Miller, G., Boster, F., Roloff, M., Seibold, D. (1977). Compliance-gaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
33. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
34. Mischel, W. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality: Beyond the person- situation debate. American Psychologist, 34, 740-754.
35. Mischel, W. (1983). Alternatives in the pursuit of the predictability and consistency of persons: Stable data that yield unstable interpretations. Journal of Personality, 51, 578-604.
36. Mischel, W., Peake, P. (1982). In search of consistency: Measure for measure. In M. P. Zanna, E. T. Higgins, &C. P. Herman (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol 2, pp. 187-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Mischel, W., Peake, P. (1982). Some facets of consistency: Replies to Epstein, Funder, and Bern. Psychological Review, 89, 730-755.
38. Pandy, J., Rastogi, R. (1979). Machiavellianism and ingratiation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 108, 221-225.
39. Raven, B. H., Kruglanski A. W. (1970). Conflict and power. In P. Swingle (Ed.), The structure of conflict (pp. 69-109). New York: Academic Press.
40. Reardon, K. K. (1981). Persuasion: Theory and context Beverly Hills: Sage.
41. Roloff, M. E., Bamicott, E. F. (1978). The situational use of pro- and antisocial compliance- gaining strategies by high and low Machiavellians. InB.D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook VoL 2 (pp. 193-205). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
42. Schilit, W. K., Locke, E. A. (1982). A study of upward influence in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 304-316.
43. Seibold, D. R., Cantrill, J. G., Meyers, R. A. (1985). Communication and interpersonal influence. In M. L. Knapp G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook oflnterpersonal Communication (pp. 551-661). Beverly Hills: Sage.
44. Sillars, A. L. (1980). The stranger and the spouse as target persons for compliance-gaining strategies: A subjective expected utility model. Human Communication Research, 6, 265-279.
45. Smith, M. J. (1982). Cognitive schemata and persuasive communication: Toward a contingency rules theory. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 6 (pp. 330-362). Beverly Hills: Sage.
46. Smith, M. J. (1984). Contingency rules theory, contexts, and compliance behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10, 489-512.
47. Wiseman, R. L., Schenck-Hamlin, W. (1981). A multidimensional scaling validation of an inductively-derived set of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Monographs, 48, 251-270.